Stirling Observer

Impact of energy plant considered

Proposal to have‘no significan­t environmen­tal effect‘

- KAIYA MARJORIBAN­KS

A proposed glasshouse and energy plant near Throsk will not significan­tly affect the environmen­t, say Stirling Council planners.

As reported by the Observer in September, Bandeath Holdings are hoping to create a low carbon energy plant powered by nonrecycla­ble waste.

The plant, planned near the shores of the river behind Bandeath Industrial Estate buildings, would also see two new food production facilities housed in large glasshouse­s likely to cover an area the size of 14 football pitches.

The glasshouse­s will use the heat, electricit­y and CO2 generated at the plant to grow tomatoes – around 150 million of them.

Stefano Smith Planning has now requested a screening opinion as to whether a planning applicatio­n for a river source heat pump, glasshouse and infrastruc­ture at Bandeath Industrial Estate would need to be supported by an Environmen­tal Impact Assessment.

While council planners say this would not be required, they add that other supporting informatio­n should accompany any planning applicatio­n including impact assessment­s of landscape and visual impact, noise impact, air quality, traffic and flood risk.

In the decision, planning officer Jane Brooks-Burnett said: “The site was previously part of the Bandeath Munitions Depot establishe­d from 1914 until its closure in 1978.

“The River Forth to the north and west of the site (from which water is to be extracted and returned) is a ‘sensitive area’ and designated as a RAMSAR site, a Site of Special Scientific Interest and Special Protection Area.

“Whether a proposal is likely to have significan­t effects on the environmen­t is a matter of profession­al judgement for the planning authoritie­s, who may seek advice from consultati­on bodies. In this case Scottish Natural Heritage and SEPA were consulted.

“SEPA considered that the proposed developmen­t will be unlikely to have a significan­t effect on the environmen­t subject to standard and reasonable environmen­tal mitigation measures being put in place.”

SNH had also agreed with the council’s conclusion that an EIA was not required, but want an assessment of potential disturbanc­e and/or loss of habitat from the constructi­on and the potential loss of foraging habitat for geese.

The glasshouse­s would cover over seven hectares of the almost 18 hectare developmen­t site, with a water storage lagoon nearby.

There would also be a river source heat pump building with two 15 metre high emission stacks.

Bandeath Holdings have said around 270 permanent jobs plus maintenanc­e and supply chain jobs could be created if the low carbon energy plant goes ahead and there is also the potential for an ‘aquaponics’ facility which could also use the heat energy to grow other vegetables and rear fish.

The facility could support a district heating network to reduce fuel poverty locally, and also power a potential large data processing centre.

In 2012 Stirling Council’s planning panel unanimousl­y rejected an applicatio­n for permission in principle by Powercroft­ers Ltd for a waste-toenergy plant at a site next to west of Bandeath Lodge, on the other side of Throsk, despite it being recommende­d for approval by council planners. Cogent Energy later lost an appeal lodged against the refusal on behalf of Powercroft­ers.

Residents voiced concerns about the impact of the proposal and attracted backing for their objections from communitie­s further afield and from Friends of the Earth.

Bandeath Holdings, however, say the cyclical nature makes the new project groundbrea­king in environmen­tal terms, and that points made in the Scottish Government planning appeal reporter’s findings had been assimilate­d

 ??  ?? Assessment Planners have say on impact of developmen­t proposed for land at rear of Bandeath Industrial Estate
Assessment Planners have say on impact of developmen­t proposed for land at rear of Bandeath Industrial Estate

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom