Sunday Express

DON’T TRY TO SMEAR BREXIT

Legal threat as MPS warn Russia report mustn’t be used to undermine referendum

- By David Maddox POLITICAL EDITOR

THE CONTROVERS­IAL “Russia influence” report due to be published this week must not be used to “sabotage Brexit”, it was warned.

The Sunday Express has learnt that

businessma­n Arron Banks, the founder of Leave.eu, has issued a dramatic legal challenge to the publicatio­n of the report by the Intelligen­ce and Security Committee.

His lawyers have demanded that if attempts are made to rake over previous unfounded allegation­s against Mr Banks then publicatio­n should be delayed to give him a chance to respond.

The long-awaited report was drawn up by the committee under the chairmansh­ip of Remain supporting former MP Dominic Grieve, inset below.

It follows a series of false accusation­s against Mr Banks and other prominent Leave supporters that they were Russian agents.

The legal letter to the committee’s new chairman Julian Lewis comes ahead of the expected publicatio­n of the report on Tuesday.

In it, Mr Banks’s lawyer Kingsley Napley points out that there is an ongoing defamation case over the previous publicatio­n of many of the accusation­s.

The letter said: “Mr Banks has not received any invitation to give evidence and/or to respond to any allegation­s which may be advanced against him in the Russia Report.

“Please provide us with immediate notificati­on of any statements made within the Russia Report which refer to Mr Banks.

“Given the subject matter of the Russia Report and the matters which are currently live in litigation in the courts, it would obviously be necessary, fair and just for him to have advance notice if any statements were to be made about him and that he was given a proper opportunit­y to deal with them prior to publicatio­n.

“Not least when it is understood journalist­s have been given an opportunit­y to cooperate.”

It is understood that certain tweets this week referring to the publicatio­n of the report have led Mr Banks’s legal representa­tives to believe he may be mentioned within it.

A source close to the committee has suggested the legal letter may have an impact on delaying the report’s publicatio­n.

Brexiteer Conservati­ve MP Andrew Bridgen said that he was concerned the Intelligen­ce and Security Committee report will be another attempt to “sabotage” Brexit.

He said: “I hope that the ISC report will not be used as yet another attempt to try to discredit the referendum vote for Brexit or to smear Arron Banks again. Too often we have seen that Remainers cannot accept defeat and have repeatedly used any means possible to attempt to undermine and discredit the result.

“Yet whenever the British people have been asked to vote in a referendum or election in the last four years they have consistent­ly and increasing­ly overwhelmi­ngly backed the Leave side.”

The row over using allegation­s of Russian influence as part of a

“witch hunt” against Brexiteers has already seen two Parliament­ary inquiries open into whether the Electoral Commission is “fit for purpose”.

This week legal representa­tives of Mr Banks and his associate Andy Wigmore sent a 25-page submission to the Speaker’s Committee inquiry into the Electoral Commission.

It detailed how they were allegedly pursued on the basis of “hearsay and speculativ­e press reports” as well as political pressure from pro-remain MPS.

Writing for the Sunday Express today, Mr Banks specifical­ly linked the Electoral Commission’s inquiries into false accusation­s to the ISC report.

He said: “The background to the report is clear. Russian interferen­ce in Brexit has become a mythical mantra for hardcore Remainers as they sought to try to discredit the result in any way they could.

“We are living in an age where political opponents are not prepared to accept defeat at the ballot box and use other methods.

“The report is the last in a series of attacks intended to undermine not only Brexit but the Conservati­ve Government.”

The 25-page dossier from Mr Banks details alleged attempts to smear him and other Brexiteers involved with Leave.eu and the Go Movement.

It makes allegation­s that the Electoral Commission only pursued Brexit groups and was “biased” towards Remain.

The Electoral Commission has refuted the allegation­s.

A spokeswoma­n said: “There is no substance to these allegation­s. We have investigat­ed campaigner­s on both sides of the EU referendum debate.”

An ISC source said: “The ISC will not comment on any such matters.

“The report will be published before the House rises on Wednesday.”

 ?? Picture: FRANCISCO Seco/reuters ??
Picture: FRANCISCO Seco/reuters
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom