Sunday Express

‘Extreme Covid rules unsuitable for a democracy’

- Lucy Johnston HEALTH EDITOR

OVERZEALOU­S public health advice and a lack of Parliament­ary scrutiny led to extreme pandemic measures that should never have been contemplat­ed in a democracy, Sir Graham Brady believes.

The chairman of the 1922 Committee of Conservati­ve backbenche­rs said he thought the Government had handled aspects of the pandemic well, including the “standout” success of the vaccines and the furlough scheme.

But other elements had oversteppe­d the mark, Sir Graham said, suggesting no administra­tion should dictate “whether you can see your family or whether you can start a new relationsh­ip with somebody”.

“I’ve always taken the view that government is there to serve the people, not the other way around.”

The MP for Altrincham and Sale West said he found some measures – such as prohibitin­g outdoor sports – “incomprehe­nsible”.

Sir Graham said he understood and supported many of the initial interventi­ons, when the severity of the virus remained unknown.

But talking to the podcast Sketch Notes On, Sir Graham said he worried the absence of Parliament­ary scrutiny – caused in part by Westminste­r not sitting in person through much of the early pandemic – meant that the measures had not been properly discussed. Sir Graham, who remained in Parliament when possible, said this had affected the tone of the argument. Decisions such as the extension of the first lockdown were taken by the Government alone, rather than after Commons debate.

He understood that fear of potential disaster would make the administra­tion plan for the worstcase scenarios.

But he added: “Some of those powers were extreme, you know, the power to make it illegal for people to see their children or grandchild­ren, the decision to make it illegal at one point to leave the country, something for which there’s literally no public health argument. So, [it is] critically important that Parliament should be watching and prepared to flex its muscles at those times.”

Asked why he thought the decisions were made, he replied: “I think it was overzealou­s public health advice, I think the intention being to try to keep people in, not leaving their houses very much at all, and some of it was counter-productive.”

He said the prohibitio­n on meeting families had hit his constituen­ts particular­ly hard and had caused “a lot of people a lot of pain – a lot of psychologi­cal pain and suffering”.

A bird flu outbreak has hit a poultry farm in Lancashire. A temporary control zone has been declared around the affected site in Salwick, near Preston. Lancashire County Council, said: “The risk to public health from avian flu is

very low.”

 ?? ?? CRITICAL: Sir Graham Brady
CRITICAL: Sir Graham Brady

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom