Compensation claim after heart attacks and strokes
started taking Celebrex in July 2002 because he suffered stiffness and pain in his joints.
After a few weeks, he had noticed an improvement but suffered a heart attack two years later in May 2004.
Ronald said: “I’m still living with the consequences. Since the heart attack, I’ve lost between 30 and 40 per cent of my energy. There’s no doubt Celebrex was a successful drug in easing the pain and stiffness. But I would never have taken it if I had known about the side effects.”
John had two strokes 15 years ago af ter taking Celebrex. He was prescribed the drug in May 2002, having complained of pain in his left arm, elbow and shoulder.
His wife Catherine said the dad of three was too ill to discuss his case.
In their action at the Court of Session, the 70 claimants are also accusing Pfizer of making fraudulent claims about the drug’s safety. It is alleged that Pfizer concealed the dangers from the public, doctors and government regulators after it first came on the market in 1999.
The claimants are being represented by Aberdeen firm Lefevre Litigation.
Pfizer said: “The decision of the Court of Session is a ruling on a procedural application and not a determination on the merits of the legal case.
“Pf izer believe this litigation has no merit and will defend the claims vigorously.
“Since its introduction in 1999, Celebrex has helped millions of eligible patients worldwide.
“It is approved for use in more than 100 countries.”
I’m still living with the consequences