Sunday Mail (UK)

watt a mess Watchdog refuses to say she’d have given thumbs up for £2bn bank’s boss

- John Ferguson ■ Political Editor

Holyrood’s watchdog has refused to say whether she would have approved the appointmen­t of a controvers­ial banker to lead a £2billion government fund.

Caroline Anderson, Scotland’s Ethical Standards Commission­er, was grilled by MSPs over the appointmen­t of Willie Watt – chairman of the taxpayer-funded Scottish National Investment Bank.

The Sunday Mail revealed last week how shamed former finance secretary Derek Mackay allowed Watt to take up the role without the commission­er’s oversight.

He was given the job despite the firm he previously led being fined a record £ 8.6million in the UK and America over a conflict of interests scandal.

Anderson was questioned over Watt’s appointmen­t on Thursday at a meeting of Holyrood’s Standards, Procedures and Public Appointmen­ts Committee.

Labour’s Neil Findlay asked her: “The person who was appointed will be a key figure in that

ba n k over s e e ing governance and probity. If you have been asked to oversee that do you think your office would have agreed such an appointmen­t.”

Anderson answered: “I don’t know whether I am able to opine on a hypothetic­al.”

She also revealed the Scottish Government made three informal approaches to her off ice and one formal approach but ended up rushing through Wat t ’ s appointmen­t without its oversight because ministers had failed to have the correct legislatio­n in place.

She said: “We were approached informally on three occasions between June 2018 and May 2019 in regards to this matter.

“On all occasions, we advised that we regulate those bodies that fall under our remit and legislatio­n needs to be passed for that to occur. Then in June 2019, we received a formal written request from the former cabinet secretary to provide oversight of the unregulate­d appointmen­t of the chair.

“We went back explaining yet again the same thing, that it didn’t fall within my remit.

“We did point out, as we had pointed out before, that if a section 3.3 order of the 2003 Act could be in place by the time the appointmen­t would be made, if we were given that assurance, we could have acted.

“We wanted to be cooperativ­e and helpf u l a s a lway s , but the understand­ing in a reply that came through the following month was that due to time pressures, that would not be possible.”

Watt was CEO at Martin Currie in 2012 when it was fined £8.6million by US and UK regulators.

The Financial Services Authority fined the firm £3.5million, the largest amount it had ever imposed in a conflict of interest case.

A further £5.1million was imposed by the Securities and Exchanges Commission in the US which described the incident as “fraudulent”.

It came after the Edinburgh firm caused one client in China to enter into a deal that rescued another of its own clients from financial meltdown.

Benny Higgins – the Government’s chief adviser to help set up the taxpayer-funded bank – was heavily criticised in 2015 for spending £18,000 on taxis in eight months while CEO of Tesco Bank at a time the supermarke­t was firing frontline staff.

Mackay was forced to resign last month after it emerged he befriended a 16-year- old schoolboy online and sent him 270 social media messages.

He has not been seen in public since and is understood to be having “medical assessment and treatment”.

 ??  ?? questions Standards, Procedures and Public Appointmen­ts Committee
questions Standards, Procedures and Public Appointmen­ts Committee
 ??  ?? advice Anderson. Our story on Mackay. Right, Watt
advice Anderson. Our story on Mackay. Right, Watt
 ??  ?? concern Findlay. Right, Mackay
concern Findlay. Right, Mackay

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom