Sunday Mirror (Northern Ireland)

Why I was right to prosecute Caroline Flack

Unrealisti­c to say they were wrong CPS chief defends court decision over tragic star

- KEVIN MOORE EMMA KENNY BY LAURA CLEMENTS and ALAN SELBY alan.selby@mirror.co.uk

IN domestic abuse cases, police are encouraged to develop evidence which doesn’t rely solely on the word of the victim.

This enables you to succeed in prosecutin­g the case without the say-so of the victim.

It means that very often, the victim – who may be fearful – does not have to appear in court.

In the past, when there was enough evidence to prosecute a case and the CPS dropped the charges, they have been castigated.

We don’t know what the full circumstan­ces were here, but we’ve heard he was asleep and she hit him over the head with a lamp.

He could have died – and we would have been looking at a murder charge. It’s unrealisti­c to expect a prosecutor to drop the charges in the face of this evidence.

Caroline Flack took her own life, but was it all about this? I’ve dealt with many suicides, and people very rarely take their lives for only one reason.

IT was not in the public interest to prosecute her – her mental health should have been paramount.

At the scene, she was found to have self-harmed seriously, and had to be taken to hospital.

What she experience­d on the journey to being prosecuted was harsher than any court sentence.

If I was a prosecutor, I’d think there was an issue because the defendant wasn’t in a fit mental state.

I think the CPS wanted to prove celebritie­s won’t be treated differentl­y.

But Caroline was treated more harshly than others.

I’ve worked with abuse victims where the evidence is compelling but we can’t get a prosecutio­n.

Domestic abuse is not acceptable, but women are often beaten up by their partners and the cases never end up in court.

There are men all over the UK who should be on trial for domestic violence.

THE lawyer accused of pursuing a “show trial” against Caroline Flack insists he made the right decision in prosecutin­g her.

In a highly unusual interventi­on, Ed Beltrami asked what would have happened if the Crown Prosecutio­n Service had dropped the case and the Love Island presenter had then attacked lover Lewis Burton again.

CPS boss Mr Beltrami admitted the case had troubled him since 40-yearold Caroline took her own life.

But he said: “You’ve got to do what you think is right. You cannot do what you think is popular.”

He added he had never heard of her before the file landed on his desk.

Caroline died on February 15, weeks before she was due to stand trial for an assault on model and former tennis pro Lewis, 28, at their £1million North London flat on December 12. She was charged without Lewis’ backing.

TERRIFIED

There was a backlash against the CPS. But Mr Beltrami said the protection of domestic abuse victims relies on the CPS being steadfast.

He said: “You don’t just fold at the first sign of trouble. The fact the victim doesn’t want to know... you’ve got to look at whether you can prosecute without the support of the victim.

“Domestic abuse is a separate category by itself – [with a] high risk of the offending escalating.

“The guy phoned the police, he was terrified he was going to be killed. He’s been hit over the head with a lamp, he’s got a cut to his head, and she’s made an admission to the police at the scene.

“In the principles of domestic abuse you say, ‘I’m going to proceed without the victim because I’ve got the admission, I’ve got the complaint from the victim which I’ll try to get in, I’ve got the evidence of the cut to the head and the mess in the flat which has been filmed by the police’.

“But obviously when you make that decision to proceed with the case you have absolutely no idea the defendant is going to take her own life. You can’t possibly anticipate that sort of thing.”

Mr Beltrami said a decision in the case was firstly made by the CPS’s 24-hour Direct service before it was referred to him for a final ruling.

At a first court appearance it was said that when police arrived to investigat­e, Caroline and Lewis were “covered in blood”, and one officer “likened the scene to a horror movie”.

TEMPER

After Caroline died, her management team said the CPS had known she was vulnerable.

Blaming prosecutor­s for her death, they added: “The CPS should look at themselves and how they pursued a show trial that was not only without merit but not in the public interest.” But in an interview with Wales on Sunday, Mr Beltrami said: “Supposing we had made a decision not to proceed, and she goes back to live with the boyfriend and loses her temper again – hits him a bit harder with a lamp and he dies. How would that look then?” Mr Beltrami, who is starting a new job as Wales’ chief prosecutor, was a CPS boss in London at the time. When informed of his remarks, Caroline’s family declined to comment.

Supposing she hits him harder, and he dies... How would that look then?

ON WHY HE PUSHED AHEAD WITH CASE

 ??  ?? AGONY
Caroline outside the court in December
PROSECUTOR CPS boss Ed Beltrami made ruling
ED BELTRAMI
BOYFRIEND Lewis beaming alongside Caroline
AGONY Caroline outside the court in December PROSECUTOR CPS boss Ed Beltrami made ruling ED BELTRAMI BOYFRIEND Lewis beaming alongside Caroline

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom