Nicole Sherz flashes her knix!

NEVER mind Cash in the Attic – gorgeous X Factor babe Nicole Scherzinger is looking at cash in the GUSSET!

The boss of a famous minge- waxing firm was mightily impressed by the tidy state of 38- year- old Nic’s underparts.

And now the firm – which can’t be named for commerciallysensitive reasons – wants to make the former Pussycat Doll their promotional crotch.

It’s believed they’re ready to table an offer of $ 1million (£ 800,000) to tempt her to come aboard.

A source said: “What firm would not want to be associated with a neat gusset like that? Look at it. No spiders’ legs, nothing.” A MAN who bit another man’s pecker in an eye- watering scrap over a stolen trailer told a court “no man is putting his mouth near another man’s penis unless his life is in danger”. Daniel Arthur Hattonwas in court to appeal his conviction for assault occasioning actual bodily harm over the unsavoury incident on September 22 last year in which he bit Peter Peterson’s penis so hard he tore a patch of denim out of his shorts.

Representing himself, the 53- year- old argued that Mr Peterson was the aggressor, starting the fight by throwing a punch, and that in selfdefence he only tried to bite him on the upper thigh because the younger, stronger man was raining punches down on his head.

He told the court. “I didn’t bite him on the penis, I bit him on the leg. It was self- defence. I KNOB GNASHER: Daniel Hatton denies chomping on chap’s Johnson during fight bit him on the leg because he was doing these ones ( punches) on my head.”

Mr Peterson sought treatment after the fight, which started over the ownership of a box trailer, at a medical centre before he was sent to Gosford Hospital, New South Wales.

The court heard Mr Peterson sustained an injury to his penis including a two- inch laceration to the underside of his shaft. Surgeons had to trim back and pull the skin across to stitch it back together.

Hatton said that Mr Peterson’s story “changes every minute” between what he told police at the time and what he later said giving evidence in court.

But the judge found that there were two indisputable facts: that there was a physical altercation between the pair, and Mr Peterson suffered a nasty wound to his manhood.

He said it came down to who instigated the fight and the “largely unexceptional” evidence indicated beyond doubt that was Hatton.

“While the bite was intentional the injury to Mr Peterson’s penis was not,” he said.

The judge dismissed the appeal and upheld Hatton’s conviction, which included a $ 900 fine and an 18- month good behaviour bond.