Huge housing development approved despite concerns
Plans for a huge housing development on the outskirts of Sunderland have been narrowly approved by city councillors.
Sunderland City Council’s Planning and Highways (East) Committee discussed two applications for agricultural land off Burdon Lane in the Doxford ward.
The wider site has already been allocated for housing in the council’s Core Strategy and Development Plan (CSDP), which was recently adopted following an examination in public.
New housing plans, totalling around 950 homes, form the next phase of development in the South Sunderland Growth Area and make up one of the largest new communities the city has seen in decades.
The development will be brought forward in several phases along with associated social infrastructure and highways improvements.
This includes a new primary school, a neighbourhood centre with amenities such as shops, a medical centre, a community hub and sporting facilities.
Housebuilders Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon and Story Homes, known as the ‘Burdon Lane Consortium,’ submitted an application seeking full planning permission for 532 homes and outline planning permission for 358 homes.
A further 60 homes are also set to be delivered by Persimmon Homes Ltd on adjacent land at Burdon
Lane.
The housing schemes were considered at a planning hearing last week.
Although the applications were recommended for approval by council planning officers, several councillors raised concerns about the proposals.
One fear included the development effectively ‘merging’ the communities of Doxford Park, Ryhope and Burdon.
Doxford councillor Heather Fagan raised concerns
about open space being “swallowed up” by the development, increased traffic and air pollution and the impact on neighbours during construction phases.
Meanwhile, Doxford councillor and Planning and Highways (East) Committee member, Elizabeth Gibson, claimed “wildlife would suffer”and said the plans would “change the land and outlook forever.”
Developers confirmed that around 50% of the total site area was being developed
for residential use, with large amounts of open space being preserved or improved to increase biodiversity and for communities to enjoy.
A bid to reject the plans was also launched by councillor Niall Hodson on the grounds of principle of development, design quality and the impact on residential amenity – however this was defeated by a vote.
Council planning officers said the site had been adopted in the council’s CSDP or ‘local plan’ and that the opportunity to debate the principle of development had long since passed.
They added that going against the officer recommendation to approve would have “serious consequences” for the council, such as a potential public inquiry.
Bothhousingapplications were approved with four votes in favour, three against.
The council is set to enter into a section 106 agreement to secure funds from developers to help mitigate the impacts of new housing.