Sex offender missed date with police when son took calendar
A sex offender with fading memory forgot to keep an annual date with police after his son removed his calendar, a court heard.
It caused absent-minded David Fletcher ,60, to be almost two months late in informing officers of his whereabouts.
Fletcher, of Kirkstone Close, Houghton, who the court heard had not moved home and was not being deliberately evasive, must inform his offender manager once a year of his place of abode.
The requirement was made after he was placed on the sex offenders’ register in 2009 – and jailed for three years – for engaging in sexual activity with a child. He had also committed an in decent assault on a female aged over 16, Teesside Crown Court was told.
In his latest court appearance, before magistrates in South Tyneside, he pleaded guilty to failing to comply with the notification requirements of the sex offenders’ register.
The court was told he was due to make his yearly address notification at a police station on September 15, but did not do so until November 2.
Prosecutor Lesley Burgess said :“The defendant is subjectto the notification requirements after his conviction for sex offences in 2009.
“This is his first conviction since then, but he has a previouscaution in 2021 for failing to comply with the notification.
“He is subject to annual requirements. It appears that he
didn’ t attend a police station in September to register his address.
“He fully accepted in an interview that he didn’t comply. He said that his son had removed
his calendar from his phone, so he was not aware of the date of his registration.”
Representing himself in court, Fletcher said: “I’m 60 years old and have a bad memory.
“I put everything down on a wall planner, but my son took it away for his business.
“My offender manager was away so he couldn’t help. As soon as I realised, I went to the police station.”
Fletcher also revealed he has an application due before Newcastle Crown Court in March to remove the notification requirements.
District Judge Kathryn Meek told him he had been on the sex offenders’ register long enough to know his obligations.
Accepting his mistake had been an“oversight” and nothing sinister, she fined him £180, with £85 court costs and a £72 victim surcharge.