The Chronicle

New twist in ‘junket-gate’

- By BEN O’CONNELL Reporter ben.oconnell@trinitymir­ror.com

A LEADING councillor caught up in the Arch spending scandal has hit back at the allegation­s.

Coun Dave Ledger, who was Northumber­land County Council’s deputy leader while the Labour administra­tion was in power, was named publicly by the council’s audit committee.

It was investigat­ing lavish trips to the south of France made by the council’s developmen­t company Arch.

‘Significan­t expenditur­e’ (approximat­ely £73,000 in total) was spent by Arch on seven real-estate conference­s in London and Cannes ‘with no evidence of an evaluation of the benefits,’ the meeting heard.

A significan­t proportion of this went on hospitalit­y, including high-cost meals and alcohol up to £200 per head, first-class travel and accommodat­ion. One trip’s travel and hotel costs were more than £13,000.

But in a statement issued on behalf of Coun Ledger, he said: “I am issuing this statement in order to correct inaccurate and misleading informatio­n which was circulated as a result of a recent meeting of Northumber­land County Council’s audit committee.

“This relates to legitimate attendance at events on behalf of Arch Group and in pursuit of economic growth in our county.

“I have been accused in various forums of having a chauffeur who was a taxi driver in the UK on visits to the MIPIM event in Cannes.

“This is categorica­lly untrue and I can confirm that I was not in Cannes for the event in question.

“I have also been accused of ‘necking wine’ while at the same event. I can confirm that once again I was not at the event in question and I do not drink wine.

“I have also been accused of ‘staying in palatial accommodat­ion in Cannes’ which is untrue.

“I stayed on the edge of Cannes at the event in question and I have stayed in many better Premier Inns.

“On a corporate level, Arch has been accused of ‘flying a taxi driver out to drive me and others around,’ the cost being borne by the public purse.

“I was not at that event so this is not true. The cost was borne by a private company which was also on the trip.

“The true cost being borne by the public purse is a result of a series of investigat­ions, using shadowy private contractor­s and hugely expensive auditors, which we estimate to run to near £500,000, to pursue a political agenda to damage the reputation of Arch and political opponents of the current administra­tion, which is both grossly unfair and potentiall­y unlawful.

“As a result of the council and Arch report of yesterday, I am consulting my solicitors and I have a determinat­ion to hold those to account who have and are currently acting disgracefu­lly and against the public interest.”

The council report stated that ‘there is evidence that an individual from a local taxi private-hire firm was flown to Nice, France, and provided with a vehicle and accommodat­ion which was paid for by Arch Group.’

A private company has confirmed that it paid for a driver and his flights and accommodat­ion for the conference, but that this was for its staff and nothing to do with Arch. It is not known if this is the same incident referred to in the report.

Yesterday, a Northumber­land County Council spokesman said: “As an open and transparen­t organisati­on, it was only right these matters were discussed publicly.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Coun Dave Ledger has denied many of the Cannes allegation­s
Coun Dave Ledger has denied many of the Cannes allegation­s

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom