Barrymore loses police legal battle
THE Prince of Wales has called for a renewed effort to “make a dent” in the scourge of knife crime and the youth violence responsible for “appalling” human disasters.
Charles and the Duke of Sussex convened a Clarence House summit and gathered experts, former gang members, bereaved families, celebrity supporters and charity bosses to discuss solutions.
The heir to the throne suggested more vocational training opportunities and after-school activities were needed for those who may find themselves drawn into gangs or violence.
He told invited guests, including Prince’s Trust POLICE have won a challenge against a decision paving the way for entertainer Michael Barrymore to receive substantial damages over the wrongful arrest he says destroyed his career.
The comedian and TV presenter, who values his claim against Essex Police at more than £2.4 million, was not present at the Court of Appeal in London to hear three judges rule in favour of the force on the level of compensation he is entitled to.
The force argued 66-year-old Barrymore should only get a “nominal” payout and challenged a High Court ruling made in August last year that he was entitled to “more than nominal” damages.
Sir Brian Leveson, Lady Justice Hallett and Sir Ernest Ryder allowed an appeal by the Chief Constable of Essex Police.
Announcing the decision of the court, Sir Brian declared Barrymore “is entitled to nominal damages only”.
The star launched a High Court damages action after he was arrested and detained in June 2007 on suspicion of the rape and murder of 31-year-old Stuart Lubbock, who was found in the swimming pool at his home in Roydon, Essex, six years earlier. ambassadors actor Tom Hardy, rapper Tinie Tempah and England football manager Gareth Southgate: “There must be better ways if we’re going to prevent all these appalling disasters and tragedies happening to so many people’s families.”
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick has insisted the tide is
Barrymore brought his legal action against the police for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment under his real name Michael Ciaran Parker. No decision has yet been made on the sum he will receive as the litigation has so far centred on the preliminary issue of whether it should be nominal or substantial.
The force argued that if Barrymore is entitled to substantial damages it would have wide-reaching implications for the police service and other organisations facing similar claims, particularly from wealthy or famous individuals.
Lord Faulks QC, for the Chief Constable, told the three judges during appeal proceedings last month that High Court judge turning against the rise in violent crime.
But she has admitted it would take a long time to tackle the 180 violent gangs in London that are dragging children into crime.
She was speaking as the number of homicides in London so far in 2018 hit 125, the highest figure for a calendar year this decade. Mr Justice Stuart-Smith had “erred” in his approach to the law.
Lord Faulks said that although the focus of the appeal was on Essex Police and Barrymore, “we should not lose sight of the fact that a young man died”.
He added: “His family, as well as their distress at this young man’s death, have never obtained a true explanation for it.”
Essex Police admitted the arrest was unlawful as the arresting officer did not have reasonable grounds to suspect Barrymore was guilty of any offence.
At the High Court, the force submitted Barrymore could have been lawfully arrested by another officer, meaning that only an award of nominal damages should be made, rather than the “substantial” sum sought by the star.
But Mr Justice Stuart-Smith ruled the defendant, the Chief Constable, had failed to prove that if not arrested unlawfully as he was, Barrymore “could and would have been arrested lawfully”.
Mr Lubbock’s body was found in the pool after a party where drugs and alcohol were consumed. In 2002, an open verdict was recorded at the inquest into his death.