The Chronicle

Views on hospital parking charges

-

I DO not in principle object to making a contributi­on to the provision and maintenanc­e of

hospital parking facilities.

What does annoy me is the sophistry of the interim director of estates and facilities suggesting that the new scale of charges has been regularise­d to remove stress for visitors to hospitals by consistenc­y, and suggesting that abuse was occurring because some hospital car parks were so cheap as to become alternativ­es for shoppers and those going on holiday.

I cannot believe anyone shopping in Cramlingto­n or North Tyneside would have ventured to those hospitals to avoid higher parking costs. I would be interested to know which nearby shopping venues were charging for parking at greater cost than the respective hospitals.

As for the charging bands – new and old – I note the reluctance of the hospitals to allow ‘real time’ charging based on actual time at the hospital.

Why can’t charges be in time bands of say 10-minute intervals?

The machines currently calculate charges based upon entry time so not technicall­y difficult. Visiting is for one hour so if you wish to maximise time with an in-patient friend or relative, you must necessaril­y incur the two-hour charge to cover time from arrival, walking to ward and later return to pay point. Charging in smaller intervals would of course minimise the revenue earned – or is that just me being cynical? ALAN FIDLER,

North Shields

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom