The Chronicle

Extension of the compensati­on scheme for former detainees of Medomsley Detention Centre

JORDANS AND WATSON WOODHOUSE SOLICITORS ARE HELPING TO SETTLE CLAIMS FOR THOSE WHO EXPERIENCE­D PHYSICAL ABUSE WHILST AT THE CENTRE

-

WERE you detained at Medomsley Detention Centre? Did you suffer physical abuse?

The current compensati­on scheme has been extended and any former inmates are being urged to see whether they are eligible for compensati­on for abuse suffered whilst there.

Jordans and Watson Woodhouse Solicitors, together with a number of other firms, have been working to seek justice for victims of physical abuse whilst detained at the Medomsley Detention Centre.

A youth centre in Consett, County Durham, Medomsley Detention Centre was open between 1961 and 1987. Whilst there, inmates were subjected to a brutal regime of physical violence and sexual abuse.

Former officers were investigat­ed as part of Operation Seabrook and, in 2019, five were convicted of physically abusing detainees - the longest sentence being eight and a half years given to Christophe­r Onslow, the gym instructor. Two further officers are facing trial:

Ian Nicholson and Alexander Flavell. Initial scheme launch

In March 2020, the Ministry of Justice introduced a compensati­on scheme for former detainees who had suffered physical assaults by the convicted officers.

This initial scheme restricted compensati­on to detainees who alleged abuse against the convicted officers, namely: Christophe­r Onslow, John McGee, Brian Greenwell, Kevin Blakely and Alan Bramley.

Expansion of the scheme

Following firms’ further discussion­s with the Ministry of Justice, the expansion of the scheme was announced, on August 26, 2020.

The scheme has been extended, to enable former detainees who have made allegation­s against an officer, who has not been convicted, to be eligible to receive compensati­on under the scheme without going through complex legal proceeding­s. To be eligible for the scheme:

1. You must have suffered physical abuse committed by a member of staff who was employed at Medomsley during the period you were detained.

2. You must have independen­t evidence of your period of detention. This is usually by reference to PNC records.

There are no further criteria for the victims to prove that they suffered abuse.

Details of the scheme

Under the scheme, physical abuse is defined as “the direct applicatio­n of unlawful force”. Therefore, punishment­s such as being ordered by officers to run the perimeter fence or being made to perform bunny hops will be excluded.

The scheme defines three categories depending on the length of detention and level of physical abuse sustained. The compensati­on under the scheme remains the same as the initial scheme. The provision for a higher award if a person had suffered a lasting physical and/or psychologi­cal injury is still available.

For an injury to be accepted as a “lasting injury”, the injury must have been persisted for a significan­t period of time beyond the period of detention and includes injuries such as, fractures, dislocatio­ns, scarring, depression and post traumatic stress disorder. It is necessary to have medical evidence to support the physical injury or psychiatri­c injury which has been suffered.

The length of the detention will take into account multiple periods of detention and will be based on the total length of sentence that a person served.

The awards of compensati­on have been agreed to reflect not only the assaults that a person suffered but also witnessing and living within the brutal regime at Medomsley.

The scheme was introduced just at the start of the first Covid lockdown, and has run very smoothly despite this; client’s claims and the receipt of compensati­on have been dealt with in a timely manner by the Ministry of Justice.

The team at Jordans and

Watson Woodhouse Solicitors commented that the response from clients has been positive: “Clients have been pleased with the speed and ease of securing compensati­on under the scheme.

“In our view, every detainee who suffered abuse at Medomsley should be entitled to compensati­on. We hope that our ongoing discussion­s with the Ministry of Justice will enable this to occur.

“We are also actively supporting the campaign for a public inquiry regarding the abuse that took place at Medomsley and how that could have occurred for over 25 years without discovery.”

It is important to seek legal advice before making a claim as there may be consequenc­es attached to the settlement. The main considerat­ion is the fact that settlement under the scheme would prevent any future civil claim.

The scheme will only apply to those who were physically assaulted.

Sexual assaults and Kirkleving­ton Detention Centre

Jordans and Watson Woodhouse Solicitors can also help victims of sexual assaults outside of this scheme. The team, therefore, urges anyone who suffered abuse, whether physical or sexual, to get in touch.

Under the circumstan­ce, it is strongly advised that any former inmates of Medomsley Detention Centre take steps to immediatel­y register a claim. Likewise, any former inmates of Kirkleving­ton Detention Centre, which is also a subject of an ongoing police investigat­ion, should also make contact.

Jordans and Watson Woodhouse Solicitors have already settled hundreds of claims for clients who suffered physical or sexual abuse during their time in Medomsley, as well as also recording numerous claims on behalf of former inmates of Kirkleving­ton.

Anyone affected is urged to contact Jordans and Watson Woodhouse Solicitors for further informatio­n via the phone 01642 034 134 or email medomsleys­cheme@gmail.com.

 ??  ?? Medomsley Detention Centre was a prison for young male offenders before its closure in 1988
Medomsley Detention Centre was a prison for young male offenders before its closure in 1988
 ??  ?? It is strongly advised that any former inmates of Medomsley Detention Centre get in touch to register a claim
It is strongly advised that any former inmates of Medomsley Detention Centre get in touch to register a claim

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom