The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Key details to tell the assessor

- Andrew Wood

Most rural businesses will now have received inquiry forms from the Assessor’s Office with a multitude of questions seeking to gather informatio­n about their business, the structure of the asset in terms of land type and quality and what opportunit­ies it provides for shooting, fishing, stalking and related field sports.

This initial trawl to collect informatio­n – the assessor does not have an existing database – is utilising the Single Applicatio­n Form (SAF) informatio­n the Scottish Government holds on businesses registered or claiming area aid payments.

The new system, with charges on sporting rates, is due to come into effect imminently.

However, we believe we are some way off getting a clear understand­ing of the values the assessor will apply to different types of agricultur­al property to then calculate a rateable value and the amount in the pound that will then become chargeable.

There is a Small Business Bonus Scheme applied to individual businesses with a combined rateable value of less than £35,000.

If the same benchmark is applied in terms of sporting rates and if the assessor looks at the agricultur­al business as a whole, rather than just the sporting interests, then the majority of farm businesses will face a sporting rates bill.

It is very important to remember that it is not the current use of the property, as many farms have no operationa­l sporting activity on them, but it is whether the farm has potential to be used as such.

One of our key concerns is that the assessor has now gathered informatio­n on a number of leases whereby people are prepared to pay just for the right to control vermin eg rabbit and pigeon shooting. If they take this interpreta­tion further, we will see intensive agricultur­al units with little or no wildlife cover facing a sporting rates demand.

We believe it will be very difficult to justify substantia­l sums levied against this type of set-up but the scope of methodolog­y of valuation is in the hands of the assessor and therefore we could see banding linked to different types of sporting activity.

There are a number of key issues farmers should bring to the attention of the assessor, both in completing the informatio­n gathering form and in further dialogue in the event that they choose to appeal a rateable value.

The costs of vermin control and how this impacts on the business, with particular focus on the cost of deer control, can be significan­t on many farms, estates and wooded areas.

With ongoing pressure from Scottish Government in relation to responsibl­e deer management it does seem bizarre that even if a business is doing an excellent job, it could get penalised through the applicatio­n of the sporting rates structure.

Some of us have been around long enough to remember sporting rates in their previous incarnatio­n and much has changed in the rural environmen­t since then.

In particular, the right to roam, implementa­tion of core paths and significan­t increases in public access being enjoyed in many areas.

These access rights have a real impact on the management costs of sporting activities and, in many cases, prohibit any enjoyment of sport other than basic vermin control.

The proximity of a property to third party ownership, roads, railways and buildings outwith its control also has an impact on sporting activity along with the actual way the land is managed.

All these factors should be highlighte­d where they have a direct or indirect impact on sporting activity on land and thus diminish the capacity for such pursuits. We anticipate there will be further dialogue with the assessor and individual landowners. Andrew Wood is a partner with Bidwells in Perth.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom