The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Monifieth and Kinghorn fail to make the grade

BEACHES: Disappoint­ment as popular sands are classified as ‘poor’ in rankings

- GRAHAM BROWN gbrown@thecourier.co.uk

Scotland’s new bathing water season is officially under way with continuing bad news for Monifieth beach visitors.

Despite new data revealing 87% of Scotland’s bathing waters have achieved strict European water quality standards, the popular sands at the mouth of the Tay have once again been rated as poor, with Kinghorn harbour in Fife the only other Courier Country beach to receive the bottom ranking.

Those planning to enjoy a dook at locations from Montrose to Aberdour can look forward to an excellent standard of water lapping around their ankles.

The final classifica­tions, now issued by the EU, show that out of the 84 officially designated bathing waters in Scotland in 2016, 26 have been rated as excellent – up from 17 last season.

Thirty-six are classed as good, 11 achieved the sufficient standard, and 11 are rated as poor, down from 17 the previous season.

The new classifica­tions will be displayed by the Scottish Environmen­t Protection Agency (Sepa) and local authoritie­s across Scotland’s beaches until mid-September.

Tailored improvemen­t plans, prepared by Sepa, are ongoing at the bathing waters rated as poor to raise all designated bathing waters across Scotland to the new standards by 2020.

In Angus, that effort has seen Monifieth join the network of bathing waters which have electronic signs this year, providing real-time water quality informatio­n, also available via Sepa’s website, app and Beachline number.

Calum McPhail of Sepa’s environmen­tal quality unit, said: “Today marks the start of the third bathing water season under the stricter water quality standards of the Bathing Water Directive, and it is good to see that there has been a reduction in the number of bathing waters classified as poor, and a general improvemen­t across the other classifica­tions.

“While this is great progress, we understand that some local communitie­s will be disappoint­ed, as we are, that there are 11 bathing waters which have been rated as having a poor EU classifica­tion.

“It is important to remember that a

Itis important to remember that a poor classifica­tion does not necessaril­y mean water quality is continuall­y poor.

SEPA’S CALUM MCPHAIL

poor classifica­tion does not necessaril­y mean water quality is continuall­y poor.

“These are still fantastic beaches to visit, and we are working with the Scottish Government and our key partner organisati­ons to help all of Scotland’s bathing waters to avoid poor classifica­tions.

“Our challenge now is to continue to build upon the progress made over the years and bring all of Scotland’s bathing waters up to, at least, the sufficient standard through further investment and infrastruc­ture improvemen­ts, along with managing pressures from rural and diffuse pollution and by engaging with communitie­s.

Environmen­t secretary Roseanna Cunningham said: “This is great news for Scotland’s seaside resorts and comes as many of us look forward to summer visits to our beautiful beaches.

“This shows the hard work of local authoritie­s, communitie­s, Sepa and the Scottish Government is achieving results.

“This kind of partnershi­p working is important as many local economies depend on beach tourism.”

 ??  ?? Top: the harbour beach at Kinghorn, Fife, and the Monifieth beach which has received a ‘poor’ grading.
Top: the harbour beach at Kinghorn, Fife, and the Monifieth beach which has received a ‘poor’ grading.
 ?? Pictures: Kim Cessford. ??
Pictures: Kim Cessford.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom