The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Farming’s on the back foot

Farmer’s view Maimie Paterson

-

F ergus Ewing has certainly tempted fate by vowing to resign if he doesn’t get the CAP convergenc­e money repatriate­d to Scotland.

Brave or stupid? Time will tell, but the convergenc­e issue has long since slipped way down the list of farmers’ priorities.

Although a convergenc­e cash injection would be most welcome, it would make little difference to the long-term, post-brexit future of Scottish farming.

Most farmers would prefer to see the cabinet secretary concentrat­e his efforts on working with Defra to secure the best Brexit outcome for Scotland’s farmers, rather than stirring the grievance pot, especially now that Westminste­r seems to have grudgingly acknowledg­ed that the devolved government­s must be included in Brexit deliberati­ons.

The constant sniping and point-scoring between Westminste­r and Holyrood that has been the norm is bone-achingly wearisome and they certainly could give Nero a few tips on fiddling while Rome, or Brexit, burns.

Holyrood ministers claim that they cannot begin to map out the future for Scottish farming until they know the level of financial support that the Treasury will guarantee, but it’s not just about money.

It’s about what society will expect the farming sector to deliver, how farmers meet these expectatio­ns, how much government interventi­on is necessary and in what form.

These basic considerat­ions are constant even if the Treasury was to shut up shop. However, the waters are muddied by the fact that although farming and the natural environmen­t are inseparabl­e, the organisati­ons

“Meanwhile, the farming industry’s still on the starting blocks ...

representi­ng each are in opposing camps, competing for public opinion, government patronage and taxpayers’ money.

The environmen­tal pressure groups are already gearing up with experts, data and research papers, to back up their claim to a share of post-brexit cash. There’s an endless round of seminars and conference­s on land use, re-wilding, land ownership, but mostly on how to get their hands on money that might otherwise be going to farmers.

Senior civil servants, MSPS and opinion-makers get invitation­s to these events but few of the organisers think it necessary to invite farming representa­tives to attend or to speak.

Even when a stray farmer manages to wangle a pass, they have to listen in silence as the industry is tried and invariably found guilty of crimes against wildlife, the environmen­t and the health of the nation.

The environmen­talist lobby is already pulling out all the stops to persuade policy-makers and the public that their vision is the right one, and its implementa­tion is deserving of taxpayers’ money.

Meanwhile, the farming industry’s still on the starting blocks and would do well to remember that it’s the squeaky wheel that eventually gets the oil. The environmen­talist lobby got a head-start with Michael Gove’s stated intention that post-brexit, the environmen­t will take precedence over everything else.

If the Treasury loosens the purse strings, someone in the Scottish Government will have to make an exceptiona­lly strong and persuasive case for farm support.

Will it be Mr Ewing, basking in the glow of convergenc­e cash success, or not? Place your bets!

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom