The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Baker keeps job but says sorry in ‘conspiracy’ row

Brexit minister apologises to Commons for allegation­s about Treasury officials

- Richard wheeler

A Brexit minister has avoided being sacked but was forced into a Commons apology for raising allegation­s which suggested Treasury officials were trying to keep Britain in the customs union.

Steve Baker said he should have corrected or dismissed an account of the claim relayed to the Commons by Conservati­ve MP Jacob Rees-mogg, which he initially described as “essentiall­y correct” and “extraordin­ary”.

He appeared in the Commons at the start of business yesterday to correct the record and apologise, hours after Prime Minister Theresa May insisted she would not sack him from his ministeria­l role.

The storm erupted after leading Brexiteer Mr Rees-mogg asked the minister to confirm if he had heard from Charles Grant, of the Centre for European Reform think tank, that “officials in the Treasury have deliberate­ly developed a model to show that all options other than staying in the customs union were bad and that officials intended to use this to influence policy”.

I accept I should have corrected or dismissed the premise ofmy honourable friend’s question. STEVE BAKER

Mr Grant strongly denied the claim and Mr Baker later had to backtrack when audio recordings showed his recollecti­on was inaccurate.

Raising a point of order, Mr Baker told the Commons: “In the context of that audio, I accept I should have corrected or dismissed the premise of my honourable friend’s question.

“I have apologised to Mr Charles Grant, who is an honest and trustworth­y man.”

Questioned on the row during her visit to China, Mrs May insisted that civil servants and ministers were “working together” to deliver the best possible Brexit.

Asked by Channel 5 News whether she would sack Mr Baker, the Prime Minister replied: “No. The ministeria­l code says that the minister should take the earliest opportunit­y to amend the record that he has given to Parliament and apologise to Parliament. He will do that.

“What I understand the minister did was to reflect what he thought somebody else had said at a meeting. He has now recalled that was not right, he is going to apologise, he is going to ensure that the record in Hansard is correct so that Parliament is not misled when that record is read in the future.

“That’s what the ministeria­l code asks him to do and that is what he will be doing.”

Downing Street had initially said there was no reason to question Mr Baker’s version of events, before adding he had made a “genuine mistake” after the tape was released by Prospect magazine.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom