The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Decom hits troubled waters

-

Up until this week I had barely heard mention of Dales Voe within the context of the Scottish offshore infrastruc­ture debate. Nigg I had heard of; Cromarty I had heard of; Arnish I had heard of; Kishorn I had heard of and, of course, I am aware of Aberdeen’s decom ambitions.

And then there’s Dundee which, of course, I have certainly heard of.

But Dales Voe had escaped me until the moment the Scottish Government decided it was the best place in the UK – bar none – to establish an ultra-deep water decommissi­oning base.

This revelation was buried on page 56 of the Scottish Government’s Programme for Government.

“Our 2018 deep water feasibilit­y study has identified Dales Voe in Shetland as the optimal UK location and we will continue to work collaborat­ively with the UK Government, the port, and industry to move forward to create a facility and unlock the business opportunit­ies this will provide,” it states.

The near-£100,000 taxpayer funded procuremen­t contract for the feasibilit­y study puts an ultra-deep water port at 24 metres depth or greater.

Dales Voe has a water depth of 12.5m, so will require very significan­t investment to bring it up to standard.

Dundee also falls short, with a quayside draft of circa 10m. But thereafter, my amateur version of Top Trumps would put Dundee in pole position.

Forget the existing working port and let’s just focus on the £10 million, privately-funded extension completed last year in anticipati­on of bringing renewables and decom work to Dundee. First, it is there and ready to go. Second, it is longer and stronger than Dales Voe and already has one of Europe’s largest capacity heavy lift cranes in place on the quayside.

While there are still significan­t gaps in capability, there is an establishe­d supply chain group around Dundee and there is a readily available labour force.

However, I am no expert and I admit my analysis is far from comprehens­ive.

For £100k I hoped study author EY’S reasoning was far more in-depth.

But we may never know as the Scottish Government yesterday refused to provide me with a copy of the report because of the “commercial­ly sensitive industry data and informatio­n” contained within it.

The government has pledged to publish “key outputs” of the report shortly. But, outrageous­ly, a document which brushes aside Dundee’s ambitions of becoming a major decom port is not going to see the light of day.

It means the rationale behind favouring Dales Voe cannot be properly scrutinise­d or understood.

And I don’t know whether the opinion of the real decision-makers in all of this – the oil companies who will ultimately foot the bill to cut up old platforms and remove seabed infrastruc­ture – have been taken into account in putting Shetland at the top of the list.

Dundeecom chief executive Callum Falconer’s job is to promote the city as the Scottish destinatio­n for decom.

You would expect him to be angered by Dales Voe’s sudden taxpayer-backed promotion to the top of the tree.

But I too am concerned that Dundee is being unfairly squeezed out here.

From where I am standing, decom stacks up for this area and I am not content to stand idly by and allow its enormous economic potential to be lost.

That would be folly indeed. And one on which I hope the Scottish Government may wish to reflect very strongly.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Part of a rig being decommissi­oned at a yard in Norway.
Part of a rig being decommissi­oned at a yard in Norway.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom