The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)
Brechin hit out at chairman claims
STATEMENT: Glebe Park club ‘categorically refute’ accusations made in dossier
Brechin City have ‘categorically refuted’ claims made about chairman Ken Ferguson in Rangers’ controversial dossier.
The document was released last week in a bid to convince clubs to back the Ibrox side’s call for an independent probe into events surrounding the recent ballot to end the lower leagues and hand Hampden chiefs the authority to do the same for the Premiership.
One of its many allegations was that, in an attempt to get other League Two sides to support the resolution, SPFL board member Ferguson told them Inverness had changed their stance to a ‘yes’.
Ahead of today’s vote on an investigation, the Glebe Park club said in a statement: “Members and supporters of Brechin City FC will doubtless have been concerned and indeed alarmed at the current tirade of negativity towards the club, and in particular our chairman Ken Ferguson.
“This challenges the integrity and reputation, both of our club, and that of Ken personally.
“Having remained respectfully silent to date, the management committee now unanimously feel compelled to firmly rebuff these claims and set the record straight.
“In particular, in the recent dossier released in support of the EGM taking place at the SPFL, there is an accusation which is pointed directly at our chairman relating to his part in the run up to the SPFL vote which took place on Friday April 10.
“This states: ‘It has also been alleged that Ken Ferguson (Brechin City chairman and SPFL board director) called League Two clubs and told them that Inverness had changed their vote to Yes and, as a result, the resolution was going to be approved and that there was no point in League Two clubs voting No’.
“This is categorically refuted.”
“Unfortunately, this is feeding the current media frenzy and, by association, Brechin City FC and our chairman are being subjected to unnecessary scrutiny and wholly unwarranted abuse,” continued the statement.
“In addition to anecdotal evidence from all of the other League Two clubs, we have in our possession verification from each club that no such call was made.
“Furthermore, each League Two club is content to provide corroboration to this effect and has stressed that they are entirely relaxed (and in reality appreciative) of the integrity Ken displayed in his role as an SPFL director in the lead up to the vote.
“The management committee will issue a further statement in coming days to fully address other allegations that have been directed towards the club in the media and online in recent times.”
The statement came hours after Dunfermline chairman Ross Mcarthur felt compelled to defend his and his club’s reputation in the wake of a weekend statement, signed off by Inverness Caley Thistle chief executive Scot Gardiner and chairman Ross Morrison.
Mcarthur is in no doubt he was the “intended target” of bullying accusations ahead of the controversial seasonending vote within the near 2,600 word ICT document, and has fired back by insisting that in fact “it is the behaviour of Inverness that has continually been aggressive and confrontational”.
The SPFL board member’s statement read: “I have said many times over the last couple of months, there are much more important things happening in our community and the wider world at present, than football.
“These matters should be our priority. “In that context, it is not only regrettable but extremely embarrassing, that I have to provide this statement following the release of accusatory comments in a club statement made by the chairman and CEO of Inverness, I am sadly now left with no option but to put the record straight.
“The individuals have been very careful not to mention me by name, but their intended target is clearly apparent.
“In life, you stand and fall by your reputation and your actions, and I thank the very many people from other clubs who have contacted me since these ‘leaked’ Whatsapp messages first surfaced, to offer their support. I like the company I keep.
“Since the SPFL director’s resolution was first issued, a number of clubs in the Championship would confirm it is the behaviour of Inverness that has continually been aggressive and confrontational. However, no one felt it necessary to win points in public, as robust conversations take place in the normal course of a competitive business like football.
“Turning to the ‘allegation’ regarding the information that was conveyed by me to Inverness FC, on Friday 10th April 2020.
“As confirmed by their own leaked Whatsapp message group, I clearly did so as Dunfermline Athletic FC chairman and NOT as an SPFL board member (as was expressly agreed and verified, before the call with other Championship clubs).
“It most certainly wasn’t a threat, simply a potential consequence of their action not to back the SPFL resolution currently put in front of them, in favour of a counter resolution which was being mooted at that time.
“This resolution would effectively have the same consequence as a ‘null and void’ conclusion to the league season, but the SPFL central distribution monies would still be provided to clubs on their current standing. This was not going to be acceptable to Dunfermline Athletic, Alloa Athletic, Greenock Morton, Queen of the South and Arbroath.
“This had been openly highlighted the previous evening, during a video conference call of all but one Championship club, and raised by two Championship clubs at the time. This meeting was set up by me in good faith.”
It added: “Therefore, the communication to the chairman of Inverness, on Friday 10th April was that any vote in favour of an alternative resolution like this, should the existing one fail, may be entirely dependent on all clubs in the SPFL Championship obtaining an equal (‘one tenth’) of the attributable distribution pot for the Championship.
“There are many more things I would like to say, but I will retain my dignity and continue to be more concerned about the long term future of Scottish football at this time. The endless point-scoring is becoming tiresome, and I would have preferred to rise above it, but I have a duty to protect the reputation of Dunfermline Athletic FC.”