The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

Grades modified to ensure ‘credibilit­y’, says Sturgeon

- REBECCA MCCURDY

Many pupils are expected to appeal their exam grades as the first minister said thousands of results were modified to ensure figures were “credible”.

In her daily briefing, Nicola Sturgeon said the Scottish Qualificat­ions Authority (SQA) adjusted pupils’ grades were fair.

However, the new grading measures have come under fire by teachers, pupils and political opponents.

Scottish Greens said the official statistics were “grossly unjust” and had disproport­ionately disadvanta­ged poor students.

Some schools in Tayside and Fife have already contacted pupils over fears they have had their grades lowered, The Courier understand­s.

Ms Sturgeon encouraged pupils to appeal their grades for free if they were unhappy with their results amid the downgradin­g criticism.

She said: I understand how difficult it will be out there for any young person, whatever their background, if the result they have been given today is lower than they were expecting.

“That is why the availabili­ty of appeals is so important.

“Every young person who is in that position will have the opportunit­y to appeal and, if there had been a misjudgmen­t made there, the opportunit­y to have it rectified.

“Today is not the end of the journey.” However, she praised the news that exam pass rates had increased across Scotland.

She continued: “We know we have an attainment gap in education.

“Poorer young people don’t do as well as more affluent young people and that is something we are working very hard to rectify.

“This system of moderation is necessary, and what it has resulted in is around 70% of young people in our most deprived areas have passed their Highers – which is an increase on around 65% on last year.

“This moderation is necessary to ensure we have a credible system of results.”

The method altered 133,000 entries from the first teacher estimate, with 93.1% downgraded.

Education Secretary John Swinney advised the grades were awarded in a “fair and robust manner” as he explained why they had been modified.

He said: “Without moderation, the rate of attainment at grades A-C compared to last year would have increased 10.4% point at National 5, by 14% for Higher and by 13.4% for Advanced Higher – year-on-year changes of this scale has never been seen in exam results.

“The combinatio­n of teacher and lecturer judgment and SQA moderation therefore means that young people across Scotland can be sure that the qualificat­ions they’ve gained this year have the same very high level of credibilit­y and value as qualificat­ions from previous years and, as such, can command the same respect.”

Fiona Robertson, SQA chief executive, told pupils: “Graded courses at National 5, Higher and Advanced Higher have been based on teacher and lecturer estimates this year with some moderation of grades from SQA.

“If you feel you have not got the grades you had hoped for or if you feel uncertain about next steps, please speak to your school or college in the first instance.”

 ??  ?? Fiona Robertson, SQA chief executive.
Fiona Robertson, SQA chief executive.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom