The Courier & Advertiser (Angus and Dundee)

MSP hopefuls must not forget tenant farmers

- Hamish Lean ⯀ Hamish Lean is a partner and head of rural property at Shepherd and Wedderburn.

With the Scottish Parliament­ary elections looming, Fergus Ewing has been sketching out changes that the SNP are considerin­g to agricultur­al tenancy legislatio­n if they remain in power after May.

One of the measures that might be taken up is to refine the rules about agricultur­al rent reviews.

At the moment, in relation to a secure traditiona­l agricultur­al tenancy, the rent review test is a qualified open market test. This takes into account lettings of comparable holdings to establish current market value but leaves out of account the tenant’s own improvemen­ts and also any distortion in open market rents caused by a shortage of supply.

The framework of a new rent review test based on the productive capacity of the holding was set out in the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2016. However, it has proven to be very difficult in practice to define a formula by which the productive capacity of any given holding can be accurately assessed for rental purposes.

Bob Mcintosh, the Tenant Farming Commission­er, supports a new rent review test based not only on the productive capacity of the unit but also taking into account the market value of let farms with each factor playing an equal part, similar to the test that applies in England and Wales. We may well see moves to introduce such a test in Scotland.

Another area which may see legal interventi­on is in relation to the removal from a let farm of agricultur­al land for developmen­t purposes.

At the moment, so far as a secure tenancy is concerned, if the landlord obtains planning permission for a nonagricul­tural use over the whole of the let farm the landlord can serve a notice to quit against which the tenant has no defence.

The tenant is entitled to claim compensati­on for improvemen­ts and waygoing payments, including disturbanc­e and reorganisa­tion payments, usually equal to five times the annual value of the rent, but receives no compensati­on payment in respect of any uplift in the value of the land from agricultur­al use to developmen­t use. Even where planning permission over the whole of the farm doesn’t exist, there is usually a clause within the lease of a secure agricultur­al tenancy that allows the landlord to resume areas of ground for non-agricultur­al purposes.

So long as the removal of the ground will not materially prejudice the viability of the farm such clauses are perfectly enforceabl­e.

if the landlord obtains planning permission for a non-agricultur­al use over the whole of the let farm the landlord can serve a notice to quit against which the tenant has no defence. A tenant is entitled to claim compensati­on as above but once again, there is no right to compensati­on for any uplift in value from agricultur­al use to developmen­t use.

The Scottish Tenant Farming Associatio­n have been lobbying on this issue for some time. It may well be the case in the future that secure agricultur­al tenants will be entitled to share in developmen­t uplift if land is withdrawn from their tenancies for developmen­t purposes.

The first Act of Parliament regulating agricultur­al tenancies in the modern age was introduced in 1883. We have seen regular changes in the law ever since and it is unlikely that we will see any let up in the pace of legislatio­n in the future.

In my view, secure agricultur­al tenancies will become more and more protected to the advantage of the tenant whilst tenants in fixed duration tenancies – short limited duration tenancies and modern limited duration tenancies - will find that there is more and more freedom of contract and a much lighter legislativ­e touch.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? IMPROVEMEN­TS: Tenants do not receive compensati­on when land changes from agricultur­al to developmen­t use.
IMPROVEMEN­TS: Tenants do not receive compensati­on when land changes from agricultur­al to developmen­t use.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom