The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

Evicted tenant farmers could get compensati­on

-

The Scottish Government may be forced to pay compensati­on to tenant farmers affected by flawed legislatio­n passed more than a decade ago.

A number of tenant farmers have been evicted, or face eviction, as a result of a remedial order brought following the Salvesen-Riddell case – a legal challenge brought about by flawed legislatio­n introduced by the Government in its 2003 Agricultur­al Holdings Act.

While the legislatio­n was being approved and amended, it emerged that general partners in a limited partnershi­p tenancy might be given security of tenure, causing some landlords to issue letters to quit to their tenants.

In reaction, the then farm minister, Ross Finnie, decreed that anyone served with such a notice would be granted a full tenancy.

This was then challenged, via the Salvesen-Riddell case, and deemed to be against the human rights of landlords.

A remedial order, which came into force in April 2014, decreed that any full 1991 secure agricultur­al tenancies created as a result of the flawed legislatio­n were no longer guaranteed for those who had their limited partnershi­p dissolved in the 2002-03 window.

In these cases, landlords were given the option to convert the tenancy and take possession of the holding following a three-year notice period.

The Government also offered to fund mediation between affected tenants and landlords.

In a Court of Session ruling this week, Judge Lord Clark ruled that tenants evicted as a result of the faulty legislatio­n may be due compensati­on.

He rejected the tenants’ claims based on the value of the tenancy but said compensati­on should be paid in respect of specific losses directly sustained by the tenants who had acted in good faith on defective legislatio­n and “for frustratio­n and inconvenie­nce”.

The Scottish Tenant Farmers’ Associatio­n said the court ruling marked a partial victory for the tenant farmers involved.

Associatio­n director Angus McCall, who farms in Sutherland, said: “This is an incredibly complex case and it will take some time for the tenants’ legal team to evaluate Lord Clark’s ruling.

“What has been made clear, however, is that the tenants are due some compensati­on for the harm caused to them by the flawed legislatio­n instigated by the Liberal/ Labour coalition and passed by the Scottish parliament 14 years ago.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said: “We will take time to carefully consider the terms of the judgment and any action required to be taken as a consequenc­e.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom