The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

Government faces hefty fine over late payments

It system: Audit Scotland report creates storm at Holyrood

- nancy nicolson Farming Editor nnicolson@thecourier.co.uk

The Scottish Government is facing the prospect of being fined up to £60 million as a result of failures in its £178m farm payments IT programme.

A damning new report released yesterday by Audit Scotland has revealed an additional bill of £33m will also have to be paid to two contractor­s to develop and maintain the flawed system, bringing the total committed to the programme to £211 million.

Yet the IT system is still struggling to make timely payments to farmers and Audit Scotland say it will not be sorted until 2018 “at the earliest”.

Most chilling of all for those who are reliant on farm support payments is the revelation there is no back-up system in place in the event of a complete breakdown of the IT programme.

In an understate­ment Audit Scotland said the system was “not delivering value for money or planned benefits for applicants”. That comes as no news to the farmers’ union whose members have been most affected by the failure.

NFU Scotland (NFUS) president Andrew McCornick said virtually all farmers had already come to the same conclusion.

“And regrettabl­y, we are no further forward in building the necessary trust and confidence in this delivery system,” he added.

“I am on record as saying that if this IT system had been a tractor that I had bought, then it would have been returned to the dealer years ago with demands for a full refund.”

Mr McCornick continued: “For three years, we have been highlighti­ng the problems of the IT system.

“Several loan schemes have been won by NFUS and put in place to bypass the IT system and deliver much needed funding to farms and crofts. But we know the loans don’t work for everyone.”

Rural Secretary Fergus Ewing responded aggressive­ly to Audit Scotland’s criticism and insisted improvemen­ts had been made in the operation of the system.

He said these included a new senior management team, improving contract management and cost controls, improving management informatio­n practices to track progress more accurately and working to ensure on-going audit and scrutiny requiremen­ts remained stringent.

Mr Ewing added the IT system had been independen­tly reviewed as architectu­rally sound and should be retained.

And he claimed the cost of £178m compared favourably against Defra costs to modernise their system.

 ??  ?? Fergus Ewing and Andrew McCornick.
Fergus Ewing and Andrew McCornick.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom