The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

A crime that’s going unpunished

Figures show fly-tipping prosecutio­n rates are incredibly low compared to the number of incidents

- JAMIE BUCHAN jabuchan@thecourier.co.uk

Despite costing the country more than £9 million a month, very few fly-tippers are being prosecuted.

Recent statistics show only 56 people have appeared in Scottish courts for flytipping in the last three years.

This is approximat­ely one prosecutio­n for every 2,800 incidents reported.

However, waste management teams told The Courier only repeat offenders tend to be pursued through the courts.

Often fly-tippers are dealt with by a sternly worded letter, or a knock on the door from their local environmen­tal health officer.

Anyone caught fly-tipping faces a fixed penalty noticed of £200 – but if it goes unpaid they could face further prosecutio­n and a penalty of up to £40,000.

Among the most recent cases was Graeme Burt, who appeared at Kirkcaldy Sheriff Court for dumping asbestos waste on land at Aberhill Industrial Estate, Methil.

The Scottish Environmen­t Protection Agency (Sepa) led the investigat­ion after police raised the alarm. Burt was ordered to undertake 250 hours of unpaid work as part of a community payback order.

Reporting officer Kerryn Sievewrigh­t said: “Mr Burt acted deliberate­ly when he fly-tipped this waste.

“Asbestos is classed as a hazardous waste and there are strict controls in place for its safe disposal at appropriat­ely licensed facilities. Mr Burt saved £246 on not having the asbestos disposed of legally. We will not tolerate fly-tipping and we hope this ruling will serve as a warning to others.”

However, research suggests the threat of prosecutio­n may not be much of a deterrent.

A study based on interviews of local authority officials found effective enforcemen­t is hampered because of the limited numbers reported, with some complainer­s – particular­ly in deprived areas – reluctant to come forward for fear of reprisals.

There are also problems when there is a question mark over who owns the land which is being dumped on.

In some cases, its quicker and easier for the council to clear up than it is to track down the landowner.

A more recent survey by Zero Waste Scotland found the majority of people (58%) supported more severe punishment­s against fly-tippers, with only 21% saying the punishment­s should be lower.

More than half of 45 to 54-year-olds thought fly-tippers should be given a £5,000 fine or put in prison. Only 20% of 18 to 24-year-olds felt the same.

Research by the Australian NSW Environmen­t Protection Authority found naming and shaming businesses guilty of fly-tipping could be more effective because of possible damage to their reputation.

In Israel, drivers who are caught illegally dumping constructi­on and demolition waste can have their vehicles impounded. This was found to be an effective deterrent.

Scottish Tory justice spokesman Liam Kerr said: “It is hugely important that those caught fly-tipping are given the appropriat­e punishment.

“This is a disgracefu­l thing to do and a crackdown will certainly deter others from doing the same.”

A spokesman for council umbrella group Cosla said: “Scottish councils are well aware of the problems and significan­t costs caused by fly-tipping and litter. Cosla is working with a number of local authoritie­s and the Scottish Government, looking to develop an improved approach.”

He added: “Part of this will be the developmen­t of a new set of tools to deal with litter and fly-tipping and increased responsibi­lities for the wider public and private sector.

“The focus will be very much on prevention, which is the most costeffect­ive approach.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom