The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

Science campaigner­s oppose crowdfundi­ng for ‘quack’ treatment

- ELLIE CULLEN

Crowdfundi­ng appeals for cancer treatment are fuelling the use of alternativ­e “quack” therapies, experts have warned.

About £8 million has been raised for alternativ­e cancer treatments on UK crowdfundi­ng sites since 2012, according to figures published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ).

The findings have led to calls for sites such as Just Giving and Go Fund Me to vet cancer appeals to stop patients and donors being exploited.

The figures, collected by anti-pseudoscie­nce charity The Good Thinking Society, show that most of the money raised was for treatment abroad, with many of the therapies not backed by scientific evidence.

The society’s project director, Michael Marshall, said: “We are concerned that so many UK patients are raising huge sums for treatments which are not evidenceba­sed and which in some cases may even do them harm.”

Appeals for alternativ­e treatments which refer to discredite­d drugs, extreme dietary regimes, intravenou­s vitamin C and alkaline therapy should be rejected outright, said Mr Marshall.

He added: “If these platforms want to continue to benefit from the good will of their users they have a responsibi­lity to ensure they do not facilitate the exploitati­on of vulnerable people.”

Edzard Ernst, professor of complement­ary medicine at Exeter University, pointed out that crowdfundi­ng organisati­ons already rejected appeals involving illegal activity such as terror attacks.

He told the BMJ: “Crowdfundi­ng for a terror attack is out of the question. Crowdfundi­ng for cancer quackery is not any better and must be stopped.”

JustGiving figures show more than 2,300 UK cancer-related appeals were set up on its site in 2016, a seven-fold rise from the previous year.

GoFundMe said it was already “taking proactive steps” in the US to make sure users of its site were better informed, and would be doing the same globally over the coming months.

JustGiving told the BMJ: “We don’t believe we have the expertise to make a judgment on this.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom