The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

Our game owes women big time – and more than cash

- Steve Scott

You know the thing about long journeys. There’s always someone – not always the kids either – moaning: “Why aren’t we there yet?”

Last week the R&A really upped the ante on their renewed and enthusiast­ic backing for the Women’s Open. By next year’s championsh­ip at Muirfield they and sponsors AIG will have more than doubled the prize fund in just four years to $6.8 million (£5m).

The men’s Open in July paid out $11.5m (£8.4m). Why aren’t we there yet? Do we have a hope of getting there?

Paying the women’s champions more money than a PGA tour autumn event should have always been incentive enough, but the driving force behind more money for the Women’s Open has clearly been R&A chief executive Martin Slumbers.

The merger of the R&A and LGU that led to them becoming the governing body for all of golf, male and female, was engineered prior to Slumbers’ tenure.

But he’s definitely embraced the concept more than his predecesso­r Peter Dawson. In fact he’s put women’s golf front and centre of his developmen­t plan for the game.

As we’ve said many times in T2G, this is an absolute no-brainer. Golf has treated half the population disgracefu­lly for the vast majority of 270 years it has been an organised sport.

What’s done is done, but the game’s got an awful lot of making up to do to women.

And doing so is going to be crucial to the game’s future wellbeing. The more women and families – even in the 21st Century, the two really go together – engage

in golf, the better it is for our game.

There’s a massive and largely untapped market out there. Seriously, why wouldn’t you?

Hence the drive in the women’s game and in community golf projects like the investment in the £10m Lethamhill family facility in Glasgow.

I’ve been told this project was not easy to push through various R&A committees still stacked with the game’s traditiona­lists. But it’s a brilliant idea and shows 21st Century thinking has permeated some of the old crusties in the big house.

I imagine there’ll be a few old diehards who flinch at $6.8m for the Women’s Open too. But their day has

obviously passed. Last week’s show at Carnoustie, even with slight remaining Covid-19 restrictio­ns, showed that properly promoted and presented, this is a top quality event in all of UK sport, not just golf.

Slumbers and AIG chief Peter Zaffino talked about “direction of travel” and the journey toward equal pay. There’s clearly a massive way to go, but there’s a will to attempt the trip, at least.

Last week I asked the chief executive about the prospect of equitable pay down the line. Slumbers said underlying it all was the profitabil­ity of the Women’s Open – its appeal to fans, sponsors, broadcaste­rs and its own

earning power. The journey towards equitable pay would always be aligned to that, he said.

I’m sure there’s a little subsidy thrown in there too, but that’s OK – as stated above, golf owes real affirmativ­e action to the women’s game.

I’m of the view we shouldn’t get too hung up about the pay gap right now. It’s a long journey to equitable pay, but it’s equally a long journey to build up the participat­ion levels of women and that demands our greatest attention right now.

Paying more money to the Women’s Open to add prestige and promotion is part of that. But projects like Lethamhill are arguably more important.

Stars help push the game forward, obviously

Louise Duncan may have arrived at a perfect time to carry the torch forward in Scotland.

I can’t think of an amateur who enthused a major championsh­ip like that since, well, probably Justin Rose in 1997 at the men’s Open at Birkdale. He turned out all right.

There were no Scots in the Solheim Cup team named by Catriona Matthew yesterday morning. Georgia Hall is the best known player from these islands. Leona Maguire, the Irish debutante, seems potentiall­y the next majorwinni­ng talent.

But we need more. A long-overdue breakthrou­gh from Charley Hull or a surge from Bronte Law perhaps.

The appeal of star personalit­ies was never better illustrate­d in a wonderful photo of a young girl’s reaction to meeting Lexi Thompson at Carnoustie. Inspiratio­n can be the greatest driver of all.

Carnoustie still the ultimate golfing challenge

Carnoustie once again proved itself to be, to paraphrase Bobby Jones about a different (although nearby) place, a favoured ground for any contest of great importance.

The course is major championsh­ip standard just about 365 days a year. New champion Anna Nordqvist fondly recalled playing it on Boxing Day on summer greens and occasional mats. It’s possibly the best bunkered course on the planet. That finish remains the ultimate test of a potential champion’s nerve.

The links is happy to do heavy lifting for the R&A; the Open three times in 22 years, the Seniors twice and now the Women twice. Both amateurs have been played here. The boys and girls championsh­ips will be staged at the same time next year.

Two prominent US golf writers, in a spectacula­r show of utter snobbery, spent the 2018 Open staying in St Andrews and commuting. One reported later there were rumours Carnoustie would be abandoned as a championsh­ip venue.

He listened to too much snotty gossip down the Jigger Inn one imagines. The Open will be back at Carnoustie before this decade is out.

It would be an utter travesty otherwise.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? WINNER: Women’s Open champion Anna Nordqvist pocketed $870,000 (£633,000) at Carnoustie.
WINNER: Women’s Open champion Anna Nordqvist pocketed $870,000 (£633,000) at Carnoustie.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom