The Courier & Advertiser (Fife Edition)

Farmer cleared in case over historic site says inquiry ‘full of malice’

- ROSS GARDINER

An acquitted Tayside farmer has attacked the public body he says needlessly dragged him through the courts.

Last month Andrew Simpson was found not guilty of damaging historic stones at Baldovie Woods on his estate near Kirriemuir.

He had been warned the ancient items were on land where clearing work was being done.

However, he marked the wrong rocks for workers and the Neolithic stones were disturbed.

Some of the stones alleged to have been disturbed were not even on Mr Simpson’s land.

Sheriff Jillian MartinBrow­n said he had taken reasonable steps to avoid their destructio­n when the case came to Forfar Sheriff Court.

The 82-year-old told The Courier he has always strongly rejected any criminalit­y but acknowledg­ed the unfortunat­e incident was brought about by the poor condition of the stone circle, leaving it “impossible to interpret” as a protected monument.

Perthshire-based Mr Simpson slammed Historic Environmen­t Scotland (HES) and accused the heritage watchdog of abusing its power.

“The manner in which HES, a public body, investigat­ed and proceeded with this case was one full of malice and intent to prosecute at all costs.

“Their overly formal approach throughout their investigat­ions amounted to intimidati­on and harassment and their misreprese­ntation of the facts caused greater reputation­al damage.

“Bear in mind that this whole investigat­ion has arisen as part of an unfortunat­e incident, caused predominan­tly by the inadequate informatio­n supplied by HES and the poor upkeep of a historic monument by the body publicly funded to care for Scotland’s historic environmen­t.

“Within their role as a public body HES have been guilty of an abuse of power, which does not inspire good relations between the HES office and the landowners in the country and works directly against their stated mission and values.

“There needs to be a clear balance between working with landowners to promote the upkeep of Scotland’s history, while acting in the public interest to protect the blatant destructio­n of the historic environmen­t.

“This particular case did not fall into the category of the public interest and thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money have been used in an attempt to haul a large-scale farmer over the coals for no public gain and to try to turn an innocent party into a criminal.

“Even the basic facts have been misreporte­d by Historic Environmen­t Scotland.

“We feel that this situation could have been avoided if procedures and communicat­ions had been better from the beginning to make it easier for the landowner to identify relevant sites.

“The measure of a successful procedure is that the least able person is able to interpret, understand and execute to avoid mistakes happening – precisely the situation in this case.”

A spokespers­on for HES said: “We note the court’s decision to acquit in this case.

“HES is committed to investigat­ing incidents of damage to scheduled monuments.

“We work closely with landowners to provide advice and guidance about their responsibi­lity in relation to scheduled monuments.

“We will review this case in light of the court’s findings.”

During proceeding­s, Sheriff Martin-Brown heard evidence that, prior to being granted a tree-felling licence, Mr Simpson was handed a map by the Forestry Commission and told not to damage marked monuments.

Mr Simpson’s office explained after the damage was reported by a dogwalker, representa­tives of the Forestry Commission could not find the stones initially and had to return for a second site visit with co-ordinates.

A Scottish Forestry spokespers­on said: “It is the applicant’s duty to determine whether there are any protected sites and in doing this they are required to check with HES and other organisati­ons with an interest – this is before applying for a felling permission.

“They would then be aware of any constraint­s to their proposed work and this would be detailed in their applicatio­n along with how they intended to manage them.”

“We note the court’s decision to acquit in this case

 ?? ?? INNOCENT: Andrew Simpson was acquitted at Forfar Sheriff Court last month of allegation he destroyed monuments.
INNOCENT: Andrew Simpson was acquitted at Forfar Sheriff Court last month of allegation he destroyed monuments.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom