The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Prolonged uncertaint­y ‘impacts on businesses’

Economist says tax hikes or spending cuts could be price of an independen­t Scotland

- Kieran andrews poliTical ediTor kiandrews@thecourier.co.uk

A second Scottish independen­ce referendum will have a “material” impact on business, industry leaders have said.

The warning came as a leading economist said the country would have to hike taxes or cut spending and is likely to face political pressure to adopt the euro as the price of EU membership if it leaves the UK.

Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said public spending was more than £1,000 higher per person in Scotland than in the rest of the UK, despite tax revenue being similar.

He said the fall in the price of oil had made Scotland’s financial position more difficult since the 2014 referendum while the issue of what currency the country would use, crucial to the last vote, could once again be key.

Mr Johnson said: “It would clearly be more difficult to maintain the pound if the UK was outside the EU and Scotland was inside and the pressure on Scotland politicall­y from the rest of the EU to join the euro would be significan­t.”

The Scottish Chambers of Commerce (SCC) said the two referendum­s and two elections held over the past three years north of the border have contribute­d to a period of uncertaint­y which has had an impact upon firms.

It said a further independen­ce referendum would be no different as it called for action to “mitigate the duration of this uncertaint­y for business”.

SCC chief executive Liz Cameron said: “Scotland has been through two referendum­s and two major elections over the past three years, and there is no doubt that this period of continual uncertaint­y has had a material impact upon businesses in Scotland.

“These are real and present business issues that are affecting business decisions and investment.

“A further referendum on Scotland’s independen­ce would be no different and the more that can be done to mitigate the duration of this uncertaint­y for business, the better.”

The Confederat­ion of British Industry (CBI) said the Scottish and UK Government­s must work with businesses to ensure the best deal for Scottish firms arises from the EU negotiatio­ns.

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) said survey work it carried out in 2016 before the Brexit vote revealed little appetite among smaller firms for another independen­ce referendum.

David Watt, executive director of the Institute of Directors in Scotland, said: “Not many in the Scottish business community wanted Brexit, and equally, few want a renewed independen­ce referendum, and the associated continuati­on of uncertaint­y which has had such an impact on the ability of businesses to move forward with their plans.”

Rob Aberdein, chairman of the pro-independen­ce Business for Scotland group, welcomed a second referendum and said a so-called hard Brexit “would be extremely damaging” to the country.

“We welcome that the negative implicatio­ns of Brexit will be outlined, alongside the challenges and opportunit­ies of independen­ce,” he said.

“We assume that the UK PM will not agree to a differenti­al deal for Scotland.

“So this will not be a re-run of the 2014 referendum. Brexit and the UK Government’s refusal to respect the EU referendum result in Scotland means that the UK that Scottish voters narrowly voted to remain part of in 2014 no longer exists.”

 ?? Getty. ?? Independen­ce supporters gather in George Square, Glasgow, following yesterday’s announceme­nt that Nicola Sturgeon will seek permission to hold a second independen­ce referendum.
Getty. Independen­ce supporters gather in George Square, Glasgow, following yesterday’s announceme­nt that Nicola Sturgeon will seek permission to hold a second independen­ce referendum.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom