The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Digging up controvers­y

As hundreds of people sign petitions objecting to the appointmen­t of pro-Union broadcaste­r Neil Oliver as president of the National Trust for Scotland, Michael Alexander finds out more

- Malexander@thecourier.co.uk

He is the long-haired Scots archaeolog­ist, journalist and author best known as a presenter of BBC documentar­y programmes such as A History of Scotland, Vikings and Coast.

But Renfrewshi­re-born Neil Oliver is at the centre of a political storm after hundreds of people signed petitions at the weekend objecting to his appointmen­t as president of the National Trust for Scotland (NTS).

The TV presenter – who was once described as “divisive” by senior SNP members for his well-known pro-Union, anti-independen­ce views – was chosen to replace Lord Lindsay at the helm of the conservati­on charity at the trust’s AGM in Dundee’s Caird Hall on Saturday.

He is notorious among hard-core nationalis­ts for describing the uncertaint­y caused by the prospect of a second independen­ce referendum as a “cancerous presence” and once described Alex Salmond as a “round, wrecking ball of a man, shaped only to do damage”.

NTS chairman Sir Moir Lockhead said Mr Oliver was appointed president as someone who had “spent much of his adult life championin­g Scotland and its heritage”.

However, his appointmen­t came under fire within hours of Saturday’s acceptance speech, with one online petition signed by 1,000 people – and later “disabled due to inappropri­ate content” – stating that his “politicall­y biased views in no way make him an ideal candidate for this position”.

A separate petition signed by over 700 people in one day said: “The National Trust (for) Scotland is in charge of many of Scotland’s treasures, we object to this man having this appointmen­t as he does not have the Scottish people and Scotland’s interests at heart.”

Others vented their views on Twitter. Peter Bell said: “I feel like NTS just spat in my face. I want nothing to do with Neil Oliver. So I want nothing to do with National Trust for Scotland.”

Stephen Dedalus said: “Just cancelled my subscripti­on after 29 years. Divisive, disgracefu­l appointmen­t of the hateful preacher of unionism.”

Yesterday the NTS defended the appointmen­t of Mr Oliver, who last year revealed he quit using social media after being subjected to “vicious” abuse from pro-independen­ce trollers.

The trust also confirmed there had been a “handful” of membership cancellati­ons yesterday in response to the furore. However, it rejected claims by some social media commentato­rs that Mr Oliver was in breach of NTS policy due to his previously outspoken views.

Quoting from the its statement of neutrality, the trust confirmed that: “No trustee or employee of the National Trust for Scotland may in this capacity express political views.” However, this did not apply to comments made outwith the organisati­on.

An NTS spokespers­on said: “The National Trust for Scotland is an apolitical charity and has no interest in an individual’s political views.

“Its 360,000-plus members have all political views, and none. Neil Oliver has done a fantastic job in promoting the heritage, history and archaeolog­y of Scotland and that clearly chimes with our objectives as a charity. Those are the skills we are interested in as we continue our work to protect Scotland’s heritage.”

Mid Scotland and Fife Conservati­ve MSP Liz Smith MSP said: “In addition to being a profession­ally-qualified archaeolog­ist Neil Oliver is an awardwinni­ng broadcaste­r and one of the most recognisab­le faces on TV and his appointmen­t to the National Trust for Scotland should be welcomed.

“It says a lot about the nationalis­t movement that Neil’s appointmen­t has created so much noise. Rather than looking at his politics, I would encourage independen­ce supporters to look at his career and knowledge of Scotland’s built environmen­t.”

An SNP spokespers­on said: “Third sector bodies are legally bound to be apolitical. The National Trust for Scotland’s appointmen­ts are a matter for it and we wish the organisati­on well under its new president.”

The NTS said an overwhelmi­ng majority of delegates at the AGM approved the motion to appoint Mr Oliver as president through a show of hands.

In his acceptance speech Mr Oliver said he was “absolutely delighted and honoured” to even be considered for the role, which will see him work as an ambassador for the charity.

His appointmen­t marked a departure for the charity, which has previously mainly been headed by members of Scotland’s aristocrac­y, including two Dukes of Atholl, the Earl of Wemyss and March, the Marquess of Bute, the Earl of Airlie, the Duke of Buccleuch and, most recently, Jamie, Earl of Lindsay.

Mr Oliver, who said he grew up with a “great love of country” and described Scotland as a “very outward-looking place”, told Dundee delegates: “When it was first suggested to me I thought there had been some kind of mistake. I immediatel­y looked up the immediate incumbents of president and I noticed right away that I own considerab­ly less land than most! And then I looked down a bit and saw that as of today I have 180,000 acres, so it’s all working out very well!”

Mike Robinson, chief executive of the Royal Scottish Geographic­al Society in Perth, said: “Neil Oliver is one of the most well-known and knowledgea­ble historians in the country and I’m sure will fulfil a role for NTS.

“I am more interested in his views on land stewardshi­p, biodiversi­ty and access, as these pertain to the role.

“Whilst his comments on Scottish politics are ill judged, he is entitled to an opinion and it is surely not healthy that we look to Twitter to determine someone’s suitabilit­y for voluntary public office.”

A Scottish Government spokespers­on said:“The National Trust for Scotland is an independen­t charity, and is responsibl­e for its own appointmen­ts. We wish the NTS well under their new president.”

 ??  ?? Neil Oliver said he was “absolutely delighted and honoured” to be considered for the post.
Neil Oliver said he was “absolutely delighted and honoured” to be considered for the post.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom