The Courier & Advertiser (Perth and Perthshire Edition)

Village housing gets the go-ahead despite objections from locals

New homes given green light but neighbour claims developmen­t ‘shoehorned in’

- EMMA CRICHTON ecrichton@thecourier.co.uk Picture: Steve MacDougall.

Controvers­ial housing in a Perthshire village has been given the green light despite neighbours’ objections.

Perth and Kinross councillor­s unanimousl­y approved the developmen­t at Ardler Road, Meigle, yesterday, despite the resident of a nearby house saying it will block daylight from his home and garden.

The applicatio­n sparked 14 objections, including from David Heatherhay­es, who attended the planning and developmen­t management committee meeting.

He said six of the 29 houses will directly overlook his garden.

“All of the windows will overlook the entire length of the garden, the patio and the back of the house,” he said.

“I think this is a serious loss of amenity for the property.”

He said he is not opposed to the entire developmen­t but asked that the six, twostorey bungalows nearest his house be reduced to three bungalows.

“I’m absolutely certain loss of light is a consequenc­e of trying to shoehorn this developmen­t into too small a plot,” he said. “I feel this could be an excellent developmen­t if more imaginatio­n and space was given.”

Councillor­s told the meeting they do not have the power to reduce the number of houses through the planning process.

Planning officer James Scott said: “Any building will have some impact for some period of the day, particular­ly in winter when the sun is lower. We did not deem it to be an unacceptab­le impact.”

The 29 homes will be a mix of two, three and four-bedroom properties, as well as a block of four flats.

They will be built on agricultur­al land opposite Victory Park, which includes a play park, cricket pavilion and playing fields.

A committee report acknowledg­ed the developmen­t included more houses than the 20 earmarked in the council’s local developmen­t plan – but recommende­d it for approval as the buildings will be smaller.

The report said: “The site is higher in density than indicated in the local developmen­t plan allocation to provide affordable housing and a range of smaller houses aimed at first time buyers.”

The housing was welcomed by councillor Eric Drysdale, who proposed the motion to approve planning permission. He said: “I am impressed by the design of this developmen­t and in my mind the developers should be commended for it.”

I think this is a serious loss of amenity for the property. DAVID HEATHERHAY­ES

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom