Claim of ‘definitive proof’ of benefits of grouse shooting

Grouse shooting generates significant economic impacts for local communities but it is rarely profitable, claims new research.

The s t u d y, led by Scotland’s Rural College and the James Hutton Inst itute , was commissioned by the Scottish Government to address questions about the impacts of grouse shooting.

Researchers looked at the socioeconomic and biodiversity impacts of driven grouse moors, as well as the employment rights of gamekeepers.

The findings, published in four reports, include a conclusion that grouse shooting is rarely profitable on its own and it often exists alongside other sporting activities such as deer stalking.

The study also found that alternative moorland uses, such as native woodland creation, can generate comparable spending and revenue impacts, but are likely to lead to job losses.

Up to 80% of direct spend generated from grouse shooting was found to occur in the local area, and researchers also found predator control could benefit other groundnesting birds and mountain hares.

The research also found many gamekeepers felt their profession was viewed in a negative manner due to a lack of understanding about the role they play in the countryside, and 56% experienced threats and abuse from those outside their profession a couple of times a year.

Scottish Land & Estates said the research was “definitive proof ” of the benefits of grouse shooting to rural areas.

The economic impact of grouse shooting is in focus.