The Daily Telegraph - Saturday - Review

Forgive me, ma’am

Andrew Morton’s 1992 Diana exposé compounded the Queen’s annus horribilis. Can he make amends?

- By Anne DE COURCY THE QUEEN by Andrew Morton

432pp, Michael O’Mara, T £16.99 (0844 871 1514), RRP £20, ebook £9.99

ÌÌÌÌÌ

Thirty years ago, Andrew Morton leapt to pole position among royal biographer­s with the publicatio­n of Diana: Her True Story. His staggering­ly intimate detailing of the princess’s life and marriage spent 58 weeks in the bestseller lists, was translated into 35 languages and inspired films, documentar­ies and seemingly infinite commentary about the royal family – and of course made millions for its author. Only later did it transpire that it was based on the ipsissima verba of its subject, via tapes smuggled out of Kensington Palace.

Morton went on to write many other books, dabbling in celebrity biography (subjects included Tom Cruise, Madonna and Monica Lewinsky) while keeping a grip on the royal market (Wallis in Love; William & Catherine; Meghan: A Hollywood Princess). Now, in this Jubilee year, he has gone for the big one: that of the Queen herself.

There is, of course, no question of secret tapes or any kind of cooperatio­n here, for if there is one thing Her Majesty is as famous for as her sense of duty and dedication, it is her discretion. Only occasional­ly do we catch a glimpse of her views, as in her delicate, dignified yet lethal put down (“recollecti­ons may vary”) after the infamous Oprah Winfrey interview with Harry and Meghan.

Morton, who has spent over 40 years as a royal reporter, meeting members of the Royal Family and their aides and household staff, has produced a clear, sober and workmanlik­e account of the Queen’s life. In a sense, it could be called an atonement: here is the biographer who has arguably caused the Queen the most pain treating his admirable subject in an admirable way.

Much, of course, is a matter of public record, or set out in previous biographie­s. There is nothing new, for example, in Morton’s chapters on the Queen’s childhood, adolescenc­e and meeting with Prince Philip. But what emerges clearly is that, as far as possible within the constraint­s and difficulti­es of wartime, it was a happy time spent with loving parents, who did their best to see that their children had companions­hip and fun – first with a troop of Girl Guides, later with young officers to dance with. There was stability and example – both of which must have helped form the Queen’s rock-solid sense of duty.

Her father explained her future from an early age, while her mother delivered social guidance (“When you enter a room, always come through the middle of the door,” meaning: walk in confidentl­y). Her mother had hoped she would marry the Duke of Grafton, but the young Princess Elizabeth held out for her glamorous but impecuniou­s suitor, Prince Philip. Their eventual wedding, two years after the horrors of war, was a cause of national rejoicing – although the Labour Prime Minister, Clement Attlee, did express a concern: was the silk for her wedding dress spun from silkworms that came from a country that we had been fighting? (Presumably he meant Japan.) He was tartly reassured by the dress’s designer, Norman Hartnell, that no, it was not from enemy silkworms but from those of our ally Nationalis­t China. On the day, the Princess looked wonderful, but the Crown Princess of the Netherland­s was heard to complain that “everyone’s jewellery is so dirty”.

Morton relates Elizabeth’s happy life in Malta as a young naval wife and mother, how she learnt of her father’s death while staying at the

The biographer who has caused her the most pain now treats her admirably

game lodge Treetops in Kenya, the appointmen­t of her former nursemaid Bobo MacDonald to be her official dresser, heralding an era of outfits appropriat­e to any rightthink­ing Scotswoman – “a tight helmet hairdo, intimidati­ng handbag, twin set, pearls and white gloves,” as Morton puts it. Only with the advent of Angela Kelly in 1994 did the Queen’s dressing become altogether softer, prettier and more elegant – and with far better hats.

In those early days, the young Queen came in for her share of criticism, although Lord Altrimcham’s article for the National and English Review in 1957, describing her style of speaking as “a pain in the neck”, earned him a punch in the face from an infuriated member of the public. The Queen’s response was to give her first Christmas broadcast.

Routine, and a certain thriftines­s, have always been cornerston­es of her life. Her morning bath was never more than seven inches deep, and 22C (tested by thermomete­r); teatime was when she usually saw her family; for years she was

careful to stick rigidly to her weight of eight stone, as clothes often had to be fitted and made months in advance of some overseas tour, and no one wanted alteration­s at the last minute. But her frugality did not extend to her mother who, subsidised by the Queen, merrily spent huge sums to fund her extravagan­t Edwardian way of life. Morton is interestin­g on this, pointing out the Queen’s sensitivit­y, not only to the Queen Mother’s early widowhood but also to the psychologi­cal shock of their sudden reversal of roles.

The Queen’s self-control has always been extraordin­ary. In 1981, when six shots (later discovered to be blanks) were fired at her as she rode her horse Burmese during the Trooping the Colour ceremony, her only reaction was to steady Burmese by stroking the horse’s neck. She has survived numerous family disasters, all magnified by the unrelentin­g gaze of press and public, many in what she called her annus horribilis of 1992, with the marriages of Prince Charles and Prince Andrew collapsing, the divorce of Princess Anne, the publicatio­n of Morton’s Diana: Her True Story, and the Windsor Castle fire. Photograph­s of the Queen that year show her looking ashen and drawn.

Diana’s death and the consequent sense of dislocatio­n between the monarchy and the people are dealt with at length, as are the tensions within the royal family, exacerbate­d by leaks from various aides. More recently there has been the Andrew debacle and the ongoing saga of Megxit. “What the hell are they playing at?” said Prince Philip indignantl­y – he would undoubtedl­y have said something even stronger had he known that the Oprah Winfrey deal had been concluded long before: only a few months after the couple’s wedding.

The Queen herself has changed, thinks Morton. “After her mother’s death left her the undisputed matriarch of the family and with the knowledge of her increased popularity, she blossomed.” Without her mother’s insistence on doing things as they had always been done, she has mellowed, allowing her own pragmatic judgment to come to the fore. Camilla, one of the main causes of earlier contention, has now not only been brought into public view and acceptance, but been given Elizabeth’s imprimatur as future queen consort.

The Queen has dealt with all these dramas as she has dealt with everything throughout her reign: with courage, fortitude and firmness. “Much loved and immensely popular,” says Morton, “she will go down in history as perhaps our greatest queen.” Who could disagree?

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Glamorous but impecuniou­s suitor: far left, the Queen with Prince Philip in 2011; and left, at Balmoral in 1946, soon after his proposal, in a still from Elizabeth: The Unseen Queen, which broadcasts on BBC One tomorrow at 7.45pm
Glamorous but impecuniou­s suitor: far left, the Queen with Prince Philip in 2011; and left, at Balmoral in 1946, soon after his proposal, in a still from Elizabeth: The Unseen Queen, which broadcasts on BBC One tomorrow at 7.45pm
 ?? ?? ‘She will go down in history as perhaps our greatest queen’: a 1955 portrait by Pietro Annigoni
‘She will go down in history as perhaps our greatest queen’: a 1955 portrait by Pietro Annigoni

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom