The Daily Telegraph - Sport

Arsenal stuck in a comfort zone where mediocrity prevails

Chance for change has been missed with scant evidence of any improvemen­t

- PAUL HAYWARD SPORTS WRITER OF THE YEAR

In the 25 years of the Premier League, no top team have been attacked for unprofessi­onalism on the scale of Arsenal since their 4-0 defeat at Liverpool. As the web seethed, Mesut Ozil took to social media to apologise for a team who do their talking on Instagram but are mute and craven on the pitch.

Three games might seem a bit soon to be starting another Arsenal inquest-fest. But this one has been building for 10 years. A great club have spent the summer piling up problems to add to the ones they already had. Too many ‘stars’ with hopes of leaving, too many contract run-downs, too few top-class players acquired, no leaders or solid centre, their manager, Arsene Wenger, still behaving like an autocrat who runs away from evidence and refuses to accept change.

You can add to that a shambolic tactical plan that had Arsenal’s two screening midfielder­s (Granit Xhaka and Aaron Ramsey) camped on the edge of Liverpool’s penalty area, blind to counteratt­acks, and a £53million striker (Alexandre Lacazette) parked on the bench.

In all the Premier League’s 25 seasons, no top side have stood on a Monday morning so roundly condemned. On social media, one Arsenal fan took a carving knife and a meat cleaver to his replica shirt to remove the crest, with its cannon now firing cotton-wool balls. Not a single pundit could draw one ray of encouragem­ent from either the performanc­e or Arsenal’s political predicamen­t, in which Alexis Sanchez, Osil and Alex Oxlade-chamberlai­n have been allowed to arrive in the red zones of their contracts, with Oxlade-chamberlai­n seemingly on his way to Chelsea.

Graeme Souness, on Sky, was the most colourful. “I have officially given up on them,” Souness said. “In the past, there has been something about them to like, and you want them to show you that they have turned the corner, but what I saw today was they have taken one giant step back. That is a performanc­e that gets the manager the sack. For profession­al players to accept that performanc­e is beyond belief. Arsenal were wishy-washy, weak-willed, pussy-footed, and those are the nice things I can say about them.”

Which top players would be badgering their agents for a move to Arsenal?

A late summer squall of bad transfer-market dealing and poor contract management would be survivable, just about, though Sanchez leaving would be the worst of all outcomes on the playing side. But all the arrows are pointing the wrong way – and have been for most of the past 10 years. From an absentee owner who appears to want a quiet life while milking the league’s vast TV revenues, right down to a team who exploit the excessive loyalty of their manager, Arsenal are an institutio­nalised comfort zone.

This season, they start a European campaign outside the Champions League for the first time since 1997-98. Thursday’s closing of the transfer window will not bring relief. Three days after their Europa League debut against Cologne, on Thurs, Sept 14, they travel to Chelsea, who inflicted another mortifying defeat on Wenger: 6-0, in his 1,000th game in charge.

Another was the 8-2 defeat at Manchester United in 2011 at this stage of the season.

Even the reaction to those two hammerings fell short of the shellackin­g Arsenal have taken since Sunday’s defeat at Anfield, which inflamed doubts about the soul of the team, the real purpose of the club and, of course, Wenger’s role as the last manager who gets to dictate the terms of his own employment – and when he might walk away.

The immediate context to this turmoil – beyond the 10 years of slippage – is a declaratio­n in April by Ivan Gazidis, the chief executive, that Wenger could be a “catalyst for change”. Gazidis was clearly reading a different Wenger biography to the rest of us.

When the subject of a director of football coming in was raised, Wenger did his best lemonsucki­ng expression and said: “No. I don’t know what director of football means. Is it somebody who stands in the road and directs play right and left? I don’t understand and I never did understand what it means.”

Any momentum for change was halted by Wenger’s recalcitra­nce and the FA Cup win, which he used to make himself seem impregnabl­e again. But then summer came, the contracts carried on rolling down, the bidders lined up for Sanchez and Oxlade-chamberlai­n, tactical confusion returned and the team returned to Premier League action with even less conviction than before. Result: two defeats in three.

As important players agitate to leave, who, among Europe’s top operators, would be badgering their agent this week to fix a move to a club who capitulate­d against Liverpool and who are stuck in delusion-loop?

Imagine, for example, how Lacazette feels now.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom