The Daily Telegraph - Sport

How clinical logic helped Bannister disprove experts

Sporting pioneer’s medical background told him that the sub-four-minute mile was far from an impossible dream, writes

- Oliver Brown

AFrenchman once asked Sir Roger Bannister’s wife, Moyra, how the runner could be sure, in his quest to run the first sub-four-minute mile, that his heart would not burst. Such views were far from outlandish. Bannister, a medical man to his core, was well-appraised of murmurs that the very attempt could put the body under inconceiva­ble strain. John Landy, his Australian rival and later the Governor-general of Victoria, joked that there was a “cement wall” protecting the mark. Even this newspaper famously described it “sport’s greatest goal, as elusive and unattainab­le as Everest”.

By 1953, Everest itself had been chalked off the pinnacles of human endeavour, thanks to Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay. But the four-minute mile continued to exert its near-mythic fascinatio­n.

As far back as 1770, a London costermong­er called James Parrott, believed to have earned no more than 50 guineas a year selling fruit and vegetables from a barrow, had been credited with the feat.

With a 15-guinea wager that he could not complete a mile in under 4½ minutes, he lined up at the Charterhou­se Wall, turned on to the flat expanse of Old Street, and ran for all he was worth until he reached the gates of Shoreditch Church. The time? “Four minutes,” said The Sporting Magazine, unambiguou­sly. Those who came after, not least Bannister himself, dismissed the story as apocryphal.

Come the early 20th century, the four-minute barrier had assumed such vast dimensions in the popular imaginatio­n that any claim to have breached it needed verifying with the latest measuring devices – and not, as in Parrott’s day, a few agricultur­al chains.

By tiny increments, athletes were coming closer to crossing a sporting Rubicon.

Walter George’s effort of 4min 12¾ seconds in 1886 stood for a remarkable 37 years, before the great Paavo Nurmi and France’s Jules Ladoumegue left track and field’s most tantalisin­g target a mere nine seconds away.

With the quality of outdoor tracks fast improving, the symmetry of such an achievemen­t – four laps, four quarter-miles, four minutes – became captivatin­g.

“I knew enough medicine and physiology to know running a mile in under four minutes was only a psychologi­cal barrier”

“I thought it would be right for Britain to get this. There was a feeling of patriotism. We had a new queen and Everest had been climbed in 1953”

“I was using a St. George’s flag on a church to measure the wind. I noticed it fluttering and calculated there’s a 50-50 chance”

“The number who have told me they were there would have fit into Wembley Stadium. Matter of fact, there weren’t more than 1,500”

“I knew I had to do the last lap in 59sec. I went flat out for the finishing line and managed to stagger over it. I couldn’t stand at the end”

“When Norris Mcwhirter announced ‘... a new world record in 3 .... ’ that was when the crowd exploded and we didn’t hear any more. It didn’t matter what the rest was”

Bannister was one of those smitten, especially once his running idol, Sydney Wooderson, took the world’s-best time down to 4min 6.4sec just prior to the outbreak of the Second World War.

Still, it was Landy who looked best-placed to be the trailblaze­r, running four separate races in Australia close to 4min 2sec.

By the time Landy announced, early in 1954, that he would spend the summer months in Finland, where Nurmi had helped create such a rich middle-distance tradition, Bannister understood that he had limited time to pounce. He regarded the task with a cool scientific detachment.

Given his clinical studies at Exeter College, Oxford, following a childhood in which he identified Louis Pasteur and Marie Curie as his most powerful inspiratio­ns, Bannister had no time for anyone depicting the four-minute mile as a lethal enterprise, beyond the limits of what the human heart and lungs could tolerate.

“There was no logic in my mind that if you could run a mile in 4min 1¼sec, you couldn’t run it in 3:59. I knew enough medicine and physiology to realise that it wasn’t a physical barrier. Instead, it had become a psychologi­cal one.” Even though the 1500 metres had been incorporat­ed into internatio­nal athletics, it was the mile proper where the legends dwelt, signifying as it did the perfect blend of speed and endurance. Whether in character or demeanour, Bannister was few people’s idea of a legend-in-waiting. He had no coach and took the train up from Paddington to Oxford on the morning of his record attempt, needing to be persuaded to go for the time, despite the blustery conditions.

That said, as he approached the start line at Iffley Road’s cinder track, he was, by no means, oblivious to the magnitude of his potential success. “It stood there as something that was waiting time, and I was in the right place at the right time, ready to do it. I thought it would be right, too, for Britain to try to get this. There was a feeling of patriotism. Our new queen had been crowned in 1953, Everest had been climbed. Everything seemed ready in ’54.”

Bannister’s race plan unfolded as if in a dream, his legs impelling him with such urgency that he shouted at Chris Brasher, his initial pacesetter, to speed up.

As he reached the bell, the announcer telling the field that three laps had been done in a shade over three minutes, he recognised that a 59-second final lap would be good enough for glory. While his technique began to desert him, his pace did not, the crowd’s fervid noise as he breasted the tape telling him that history was his.

A master of self-effacement, Bannister, far prouder of his later neurologic­al work than his athletics career, would always act perplexed at the fuss his accomplish­ment attracted.

He preferred to identify his victory over Landy, at the Empire Games in Vancouver three months later, as his defining race. He retained a pang of regret, too, that he did not convert his fourth place in the 1500m at the 1952 Helsinki Olympics into a medal.

And yet his status as a pioneer, sealing a distinctio­n that had preoccupie­d and thwarted generation­s before, elevated him to a plane far beyond.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Trailblaze­r: Roger Bannister crosses the tape at the end of his record-breaking mile run, a feat that earned him the acclaim of Sir Winston Churchill (below); (left) with wife Moyra at the Palace
Trailblaze­r: Roger Bannister crosses the tape at the end of his record-breaking mile run, a feat that earned him the acclaim of Sir Winston Churchill (below); (left) with wife Moyra at the Palace

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom