The Daily Telegraph - Sport

Buttler is running out of time as a Test player

- Sir Geoffrey Boycott

70 Runs Jos Buttler’s wicketkeep­ing has cost England in this Test according to Cricviz – the most by any keeper for three years

It was a pleasure watching Pakistan wicketkeep­er Mohammad Rizwan standing back, taking the late wobbling balls from the quicks and standing up to the turn and bounce from the wrist-spinners. His glovework was immaculate.

How different it was watching Jos Buttler, who always looks like a stand-in or makeshift keeper. You get the impression Buttler is working hard to do the job and Pakistan’s keeper is a natural.

Most modern-day Test teams prefer to play a batsmankee­per to help out with runs and, deep down, they are all hoping they can find another Adam Gilchrist. That is OK so long as your wicketkeep­er does not miss chances and an opposition batsman does not then go on to hurt your team with a big hundred, as happened with Buttler’s missed stumping of Shan Masood, whose 156 could prove to be a match-winning contributi­on.

The difference between Gilchrist and those who have tried to copy him is that he was not a great keeper, but he made few mistakes. And when he batted he was not just good – he was exceptiona­l.

England keep hoping that Buttler can do the same for them, but he rarely brings his white-ball batting to Test cricket. The reason is that his footwork is poor.

Buttler has tremendous hand-eye co-ordination, with a range of improvised shots that can be breathtaki­ng. In one-day cricket, technique is low down the list of priorities. In Test cricket, technique is imperative for a batsman. If you have not got it, your success rate will be ordinary.

The best wicketkeep­er-batsman I played with or saw was Alan Knott. The game today is full of statistics, but I judge a wicketkeep­er on how many catches or stumpings he misses – not on how many he takes.

Every keeper is dependent on his bowlers for creating nicks and stumping opportunit­ies. If he keeps wicket to a poor set of bowlers, he will not get the statistics. Knott missed very few chances – and he made his runs when the team were in trouble. For me, he was a genius.

Buttler is selected as a batsman who keeps wicket. Even his best friends and supporters could not say he is a top wicketkeep­er. If they

did then they would be kidding themselves and trying to kid us.

Therefore, Buttler has to produce a match-changing innings – and soon. When he has a bad match, like this one at Old Trafford – missing a crucial stumping and catches that hurt the team – it is bound to put more pressure on his lack of runs.

Nobody should want him to fail or miss chances. But we cannot help him, either. He alone has to find a way to improve his wicketkeep­ing and score some vital runs. Otherwise, being a nice lad and a wonderful white-ball batsman should not be enough to keep him in the Test team.

Our England team are good – but not good enough to wait much longer for Buttler to improve.

His performanc­es need to get a lot better.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom