The Daily Telegraph - Sport

Walker’s rare gifts would be lost today

- Thom Gibbs

When Murray Walker appeared on Pointless Celebritie­s in 2015 he introduced himself as follows: “I’m Murray Walker, I’m a retired advertisin­g executive and I’m with my mate Nigel Mansell.” Mansell gave him a tender kiss on top of his head.

Character commentato­rs: (clockwise from right) Murray Walker, Harry Carpenter with Frank Bruno, Martin Tyler and Caroline Barker

Driven by an uncomplica­ted love for his sport, Walker was always the observer rather than a wannabe star. Because, or in spite of his nasal effervesce­nce, he was an entirely lovable presence. It is tough to imagine any current commentato­r stirring similar feelings.

Great sporting commentary distils emotions. Think of the euphoria of Martin Tyler’s “Agueroooo”, the solemnity of Jack Karnehm’s “good luck mate” for Cliff Thorburn’s 147 at the Crucible, the disbelief of Harry Carpenter on Muhammad Ali: “Oh my God, he’s won the title back at 32.” Walker’s finest hour came in 1996. “And Damon Hill exits the chicane, and wins the Japanese Grand Prix. And I’ve got to stop, because I’ve got a lump in my throat.”

By contrast, this is the era of the profession­ally inoffensiv­e. It would be a mistake to dismiss a generation of sports broadcaste­rs as bland. Caroline Barker’s thrilling and increasing­ly hoarse work when England won netball gold at the 2018 Commonweal­th Games was big-moment commentary as thrilling as the old favourites.

Yet the overall trend is veering away from Walker’s sort, the character commentato­r. Match of the Day now is a procession of capable Steves and Simons whose work is hard to fault but even harder to remember. The big characters are largely in the studio: Gary Lineker, Alan Shearer and Ian Wright are the names you would associate with Motd. Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher appear on more posters for Sky Sports than Rob Hawthorne and Bill Leslie.

There is now an orthodoxy about how to commentate which few broadcaste­rs attempt to challenge. Serious, statty, chatty. This could be down to a malaise in recruitmen­t but is more likely an inevitable consequenc­e of profession­al evolution.

This has its parallels within sport and beyond. Think of the Twenty20 specialist’s struggle to bat patiently in Test cricket, or the trend for holding possession from goal-kicks in football. Think of how the only big-budget films now are about superheroe­s, when 25 years ago the blockbuste­rs had room for Independen­ce Day (about an alien invasion), Twister (about some tornadoes) and The Rock (about Sean Connery escaping from Alcatraz). There has been a great flattening of output, a broad agreement about the optimised way to do things.

This leaves little space for the unique style of someone such as Murray Walker. He may have had his rough edges sanded smooth if starting in 2021. One viewer’s soothingly distinctiv­e voice is another’s tedious drone. Modern sports broadcasti­ng seems keen to plant itself in the middle of the road, conscious of an increasing­ly diverse audience which reaches well beyond the peculiar tastes of this island.

Production decisions will be driven by data and focus groups in a way unthinkabl­e in Walker’s pomp. Consider the unthreaten­ing gloss of recent Netflix production­s such as The Queen’s Gambit or Bridgerton. Ideal for an internatio­nal audience which is seeking comfort, not challenge.

There is more televised sport than ever before, and most of it is behind the paywall. Count the times “the voice of his sport” appeared in Walker obituaries. It is hard to be the “voice of ” anything much when your audience is limited to paid-tv subscriber­s.

Walker’s level of ubiquity is impossible to replicate now. Without the confidence that comes with being the undisputed No1 there is less room for experiment­ation. It is hard to imagine not just another Walker, but another Bill Mclaren, Richie Benaud or Sid Waddell.

It is also worth asking how any of those names might have fared in the era of social media. Walker’s ‘Murraryism­s’ are remembered fondly now, but imagine the fury they would cause today.

Sport is so resolutely serious now. Little wonder the trend is towards the innocuous when more or less anything you say is potential fuel for an online roasting. It does not pay to be the outlier any more.

Walker died beloved, but modern sport wants all your love directed to the product. Focus your attention on the pure sporting action, slickly presented, unarguably high quality, best bits clipped up for social.

If that is your overarchin­g aim then there is little space for the eccentrici­ty of a Murray Walker, and all of the brilliance it may bring.

Little wonder the trend is for the innocuous when anything you say is fuel for an online roasting

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom