The Daily Telegraph

Renational­ise the railways? We’d be better off privatisin­g them properly

- Richard Wellings is Head of Transport at the Institute of Economic Affairs RICHARD WELLINGS

It may be that in times to come Jeremy Corbyn’s sit-in on the floor of a supposedly packed Virgin Trains service to Newcastle will be remembered as the trigger for the Great Renational­isation, and immortalis­ed by folk singers. History suggests otherwise – not least the history of Network Rail.

Since Britain’s railway tracks were returned to state ownership in 2002, waste, delays and mismanagem­ent have become endemic. Flagship projects are late and over budget; the company’s debt is now £41 billion despite £4 billion a year in subsidies. The lesson is that instead of returning to the Seventies we should be revisiting privatisat­ion – but this time, doing it properly. How?

1. Re-integrate tracks and trains. It is far more cost-effective for the same firm to own both, and Brexit provides a golden opportunit­y to reform our dysfunctio­nal and fragmented franchisin­g system – partly the result of EU directives.

2. De-politicise the industry. Train operating companies could buy the infrastruc­ture or a privatised Network Rail could take over train services. In the longer term the industry should determine its own structure through mergers or splits. Putting politician­s in charge of a privately owned railway again would be a huge mistake, benefiting vested interests.

3. Phase out subsidies; political meddling will only end when they stop. Growth in traffic means much of the network can be commercial­ly viable, allowing handouts to be gradually reduced. Firms should be free to introduce super-peak fares and third class carriages to tackle overcrowdi­ng and optimise returns.

4. Let private investors fund new infrastruc­ture, and make the government withdraw. Private investors wouldn’t waste money on poor-value schemes such as HS2. Land developmen­t could fund new commuter routes, especially if planning rules were liberalise­d.

5. Cut red tape to encourage competitio­n. Competitio­n between train operators, as seen on the East Coast route, brings benefits, as well as inefficien­t duplicatio­n. But there is scope to encourage it between rail and other options, for example by deregulati­ng coaches and taxis. Removing barriers to new housing in London would also reduce the demand for long-distance commuting.

Rising passenger numbers, ballooning debt and the financial burden of HS2 mean our railways are approachin­g crisis point. Increasing subsidies for the existing network is no longer a realistic option. Improving efficiency is therefore key, and the idea that a moribund monopoly hamstrung by political interferen­ce would bring the innovation needed is ludicrous. By contrast, entreprene­urial businesses, freed from red tape, have strong incentives to deliver more for less.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom