The Daily Telegraph

Now is the time for a health service revolution

Mrs May must seize the moment – privatisat­ion and social insurance are the obvious remedies

- JEREMY WARNER FOLLOW Jeremy Warner on Twitter @jeremywarn­eruk; READ MORE at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

According to a study published in The Lancet this week, South Korea is likely quite soon to become the first country where average life expectancy among women exceeds 90 years. Japan, Switzerlan­d, and even France, are not far behind. Some further improvemen­t is also forecast for Britain, particular­ly among men, but it is not nearly as big.

There are many reasons for these disparitie­s – diet, lifestyle, genetic predisposi­tion, and so on. But also cited is a much more worrying contributo­ry factor – relatively equal access to cutting-edge healthcare.

There is not a healthcare system in the world today which is not in some form of crisis. All face the same challenges of ageing population­s, rising expectatio­ns and spiralling costs. Yet the situation in Britain has grown particular­ly acute.

The shameful truth is that, on many measures, the National Health Service is falling short, so much so that it is being overtaken even by the likes of South Korea, which little more than 30 years ago was still a developing country.

This failure is no reflection on NHS doctors, nurses and support staff, whose dedication remains beyond reproach, or indeed the standards of medicine they apply. Rather, it is the structure they work under, stuck as it is with an outmoded funding model which fails to strike the right balance between supply and demand, and seems politicall­y immune to meaningful reform.

As a share of national income, we are simply not spending enough to deliver the healthcare voters demand. Other countries do better.

Rationing – by way of lengthenin­g waiting times and slow adoption of new treatments – is already a reality as limited resource is spread ever more thinly. The pressures on health spending from ageing and chronic disease, moreover, threaten to completely overwhelm the public finances in the years ahead, absent of steep tax rises or spending cuts elsewhere.

We seem to have the worst of all worlds; a system which is both failing its users and is gobbling up a progressiv­ely rising and entirely unsustaina­ble share of tax pounds. The system is at breaking point, but there is no sign of the Government acting to mitigate the unfolding train crash.

There is another Budget in less than two weeks’ time. Philip Hammond, the Chancellor, has told MPs that with the economic uncertaint­y of Brexit looming, there is no money for anything – no money for either tax cuts or spending increases. No doubt something will, none the less, be found for the NHS; it always is. But he’s not wrong in his diagnosis. Nearly 10 years after the financial crisis, Britain still has one of the biggest budget deficits in the Western world, together with a yawning great trade deficit to match.

Mercifully, we have full employment and some growth, yet the sort of money needed to patch things up at the NHS is simply not there. Nor would it work in the long term even if it was. Whatever is offered is never enough. Before long, sometimes within a matter of months, the NHS is back for more. The NHS is a leviathan whose appetite can never be sated.

The solution has been obvious for a long time. First, Britain needs to overcome its almost pathologic­al aversion to privatisat­ion of healthcare. Nobody would seriously suggest the NHS should be manufactur­ing its own drugs and equipment. These it buys from the private sector, together with a growing proportion of the services it offers. This process needs to go much further in pursuit of value for money.

But much more important, we need to shift from the present taxpayerfu­nded model to a compulsory system of social insurance, either privately provided as in Switzerlan­d, or as in the Netherland­s, raised and administer­ed through the state. Basic, top-class healthcare would remain universal – low-earners would get better treatment than they do today – but citizens could choose to pay more for higher levels of cover. The effect would be to ensure both that a higher proportion of national income is spent on healthcare, and that it becomes subject to more realistic expectatio­ns. The notion that healthcare, unlike almost anything else, is somehow “free”, creates its own insatiable demand.

Without urgent action, the outlook for both the NHS and the public finances looks grim. With no political opposition to speak of, there could scarcely be a better time to seize the moment and drive through the modernisat­ion in healthcare funding the country so badly needs.

The great irony is that Theresa May’s very political hegemony makes her as much a prisoner of the NHS as her Labour opponents. She daren’t touch it for fear of damaging what is for the moment a politicall­y unassailab­le position.

Her “one party state”, governed by the people for the people, depends as much on embracing our “precious” NHS as it does on delivering a successful Brexit. And so we beat on, falling ever further behind in our healthcare and life expectancy.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom