The Daily Telegraph

Foreign aid ‘wasted’ on green energy plans

- By Robert Mendick Chief Reporter

SERIOUS questions are raised today over hundreds of millions of pounds of British taxpayers’ money being “wasted” on climate change projects such as an Ethiopian wind farm and Kenyan solar power plant.

A Daily Telegraph investigat­ion shows little benefit so far from a £2 billion foreign aid programme to tackle climate change that was establishe­d eight years ago. One scheme, costing £260 million of UK taxpayers’ money, has produced only enough renewable electricit­y to power the equivalent of 100 British households.

Projects including solar parks in Kenya and Mali, a rubbish-burning power plant in the Maldives and wind farming project in Ethiopia are all earmarked for funding from the scheme.

The investigat­ion raises major concerns over the use of internatio­nal aid money to fund complex renewable energy schemes in some of the world’s poorest countries. It will also reignite the row over the Government’s commitment, championed by David Cameron, to ring fence the £12 billion annual foreign aid budget, which is fixed at 0.7 per cent of national income.

Critics have accused the Government of “scandalous­ly wasting” taxpayers’ money on the schemes.

While officials insist publicly the climate change schemes are working and should only be judged in 2023 at its end point, the Department for Internatio­nal Developmen­t (Dfid) has expressed concern over delays to projects and the management of them.

One senior source said ministers inside Dfid are questionin­g whether the money would have been better spent on humanitari­an causes instead. The

complex set of schemes – known as Climate Investment Funds – are run by the World Bank, with almost one-third of the £6.75 billion total funding provided by the UK Government. No other country has put in so much cash.

The funds, consisting of four separate schemes, are intended to kick-start green energy projects such as the building of large-scale wind and solar farms in poorer countries and environmen­tally friendly public transport.

One of the four schemes – the £630 million Scaling Up Renewable Energy Project (SREP) – was set up with the help of £268 million from the Dfid and the now defunct Department for Energy and Climate Change.

But at the halfway point of the project to provide renewable energy and improve energy access in 28 of the world’s poorest countries, including Haiti, Ethiopia and Bangladesh, little appears to have been achieved by way of effective results. To date, just three SREP-funded projects – two in Honduras and one in Nepal – are producing either green electricit­y or improving access to it. A further 20 approved projects are not making any positive impact, according to an annual report published at the end of last year.

A second scheme – The Climate Technology Fund (CTF) – to which the UK has contribute­d £1.2 billion, is intended to deliver green electricit­y and reduce emissions in “middle income” countries including gas and oil rich Kazakhstan as well as India, Turkey and Morocco. More than halfway through the scheme, set up in 2009, it is supplying about seven per cent of the renew- able energy expected by 2023. To date, only 26 projects out of 70 approved schemes under the CTF have reported any benefit. The vast majority of the projects do not record any figures at all.

A senior Dfid source said: “Ministers have called in a number of climate programmes for close scrutiny to ensure they are on track and delivering.”

The insider added: “The money would be better spent on our humanitari­an response with proven results than some of the incredibly complex climate programmes.”

Dr John Constable, director of the Renewable Energy Foundation, a charity strongly critical of British green energy policy, said: “Overseas developmen­t projects have long been plagued with expensive failures, but the cur- rent crop of climate change and renewable energy initiative­s are showing strong signs of being the most negligentl­y conducted and scandalous­ly wasteful to date.”

The Government defended the performanc­e of the funds. A spokesman said: “The Climate Investment Fund is helping provide the world’s poorest people with stronger defences to extreme weather which can cause lifethreat­ening crises such as floods, droughts and famine.

“The UK’s investment is already delivering results by producing reliable sources of food, improving infrastruc­ture and giving people access to clean energy, and all programmes are on course to meet the published performanc­e targets for 2023.”

 ??  ?? A wind farm in Ethiopia, one of many countries where the World Bank has placed investment in alternativ­e energies
A wind farm in Ethiopia, one of many countries where the World Bank has placed investment in alternativ­e energies

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom