The Daily Telegraph

This soft line is rubbish. It’s time to get tough and clean up our act

- John Read is founder of the Clean Up Britain campaign JOHN READ

Michael Gove is on the comeback trail. Back in government, he last week reclaimed British waters for fishing. But if he really wants to boost his popularity ratings there is one environmen­tal issue that voters care about more than any other: litter.

Millions care about the scourges of rubbish and fly-tipping, and with good reason. A filthy country is a sign of a breakdown in community pride and wider respect. It’s bad for the national psyche and its direct and indirect costs run into the billions. Local councils alone spend £1 billion every year on cleaning it up; a scandalous waste of money when social care and community services are being cut.

Littering might seem like a small offence, but across Europe illegal dumping of waste has become organised crime’s second biggest money spinner after drugs. Meanwhile, in this country this week The Daily Telegraph reported a ridiculous situation where travellers occupying a park in Basildon, Essex, started charging residents £30 to leave their waste. This is anti-social, illegal, and must be severely punished. Many conservati­ves did not vote for the party so that it could be soft on such crime.

Sadly, however, the Government’s new antilitter strategy is fundamenta­lly flawed. The stated intention to launch a national campaign to change the rampant culture of littering is positive, but as someone who sits on the government’s Litter Advisory Group, I know there is no money to pay for it. Two things need to change.

First, a sustained national campaign – costing more than £50million over 10 years – needs to be funded by the introducti­on of a legally binding extended producer responsibi­lity (EPR) scheme, as exists in many other European countries. This will see the manufactur­ers of heavily littered products, for example producers of drink cans and fast-food wrapping take some financial responsibi­lity for the environmen­tal damage that their products cause when carelessly tossed away.

The “polluter pays” principle, long-establishe­d in Whitehall, needs to be invoked. As good corporate citizens, major companies have every incentive not to see their brands lying discarded with such depressing regularity by the road. For them, supporting a national campaign is good business sense.

Secondly, various organs of state are guilty of a considerab­le derelictio­n of public duty. The Department of Transport quango, Highways England, is responsibl­e for the motorways and trunk roads in England. It has a statutory legal duty to keep its land clean. It’s obvious to any driver that it is failing spectacula­rly and, in the process, breaking the law every day. Yet they continue with impunity. This is a form of state-tolerated lawbreakin­g. The Government should turn a blind eye to it no longer.

One of the biggest sources of litter on verges is from bulk waste transporte­rs. The Environmen­t Agency used to prosecute the operators of waste transport vehicles who allow rubbish to escape but it no longer does so.

Is it just not willing or is it unable to enforce the law?

Without such action, we will all continue to inhabit a filthy environmen­t.

Mr Gove, your appallingl­y littered country needs you – and your party needs the votes.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom