The best way to combat reckless cycling

SIR – The recent death of a pedestrian at the hands of a cyclist (report, September 21) further illustrates the need for action on this issue.

When cyclists were allowed to ride only on roads, the need for regulation was slight. At that time they were likely to be victims; now, with cyclists riding on both roads and footpaths, they are just as likely to be the perpetrators of injury.

The solution is for all cyclists to carry insurance. The insurers should give each one a unique number, to be displayed on their bike. This would make the cyclist traceable and, consequently, more careful. D J Beck

Hinckley, Leicestershire

SIR – The idea of regulating cyclists in a similar way to motorists is welcome.

The other night I suggested that a cyclist push his bike onto the crowded concourse of Charing Cross station, rather than try to ride it through the crowd. I was met with a stream of invective and no reduction in speed. This dangerous behaviour has to stop. Andrew Wauchope

London SE11

SIR – We need to be protected from pedestrians too.

There should be immediate legislation to ban the use of earphones, so that people can hear ambient sounds clearly. We also need to ban the practice of walking while looking at a small electronic device, as well as the extremely antisocial habit of stopping without warning as soon as a new message arrives.

It is also worth pointing out that there is currently no legislation requiring cyclists to have bells on their bikes. Frank Yates

Southport, Lancashire