The Daily Telegraph

Victory for victims of abuse by foster carers

- By Olivia Rudgard SOCIAL AFFAIRS CORRESPOND­ENT

FOSTER children will be able to sue a local authority for abuse that happened under their care following a landmark ruling by the Supreme Court.

Natasha Armes, now 40, from Nottingham, won her case against Nottingham­shire County Council after justices ruled by four to one that it was liable for abuse she suffered as a child 30 years ago.

In their ruling, the Supreme Court justices found the local authority was “vicariousl­y liable” for the abuse committed by the foster parents, even though it was not negligent in choosing or supervisin­g them.

Lawyers said the decision meant councils were now liable for any abuse carried out by foster carers, historical­ly or in the future.

The ruling overturned previous decisions against Ms Armes at the High Court and Court of Appeal.

In the judgment Lord Reed said the local authority carried out the recruitmen­t, selection and training of foster parents, paid their expenses and supervised the fostering. The “foster parents with which the present case is concerned cannot be regarded as carrying on an independen­t business of their own”, he said.

“Although the picture presented is not without complexity, neverthele­ss when considered as a whole it points toward the conclusion that the foster parents provided care to the child as an integral part of the local authority’s organisati­on of its child care services.”

Ms Armes’ lawyers, Uppal Taylor Solicitors, described the ruling in a statement on their website as “landmark”.

They said: “Today, the long-awaited judgment found that local authoritie­s are vicariousl­y liable for the actions of foster parents.”

Kim Harrison, a lawyer from Slater and Gordon, which represents children who have been abused by foster carers, said: “This judgment has finally put right a terrible injustice which has denied so many victims a legal redress that is widely available to other survivors of abuse.

“Until now local authoritie­s had effectivel­y been able to avoid responsibi­lity for the devastatin­g consequenc­es of placing a child in the care of an abusive foster parent.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom