The Daily Telegraph

Older celebritie­s ‘fuel motherhood myths’

Study says famous parents who do not reveal fertility treatment are misleading people over later pregnancy

- By Henry Bodkin in San Antonio

Middle-aged celebritie­s who give birth without acknowledg­ing they used IVF are fuelling “damaging” misconcept­ions about getting pregnant in later life, doctors warned. A study of magazine interviews with high-profile new mothers found they routinely “glamorised” pregnancy at advanced ages and downplayed the impact of delaying motherhood. Experts said women eager to establish a career before embarking on parenthood risked falling prey to a false notion of flexible fertility.

MIDDLE-AGED celebritie­s who give birth without acknowledg­ing they underwent IVF are fuelling “highly damaging” misconcept­ions about the chances of getting pregnant in later life, leading doctors have warned.

A detailed study of glossy magazine interviews featuring high-profile new mothers found they routinely “glamorised” pregnancy at advanced ages and downplayed the impact of delaying trying for a baby.

Experts said young women eager to establish a career before embarking on parenthood risked falling prey to a false notion of flexible fertility, leaving them childless or depending on reproducti­ve therapy themselves.

Research by New York University School of Medicine examined 416 issues of Cosmopolit­an, People Magazine and Us Weekly from 2010 to 2014.

Presented today at the American Society for Reproducti­ve Medicine (ASRM) congress in Texas, the study revealed that of 240 celebritie­s featured in relation to pregnancy, only two were reported as having used assisted reproducti­ve therapy (ART), such as IVF, with their own eggs.

This was despite the majority – 56 per cent – of the female celebritie­s involved being 35 or older.

Among this group, 7 per cent were mentioned as having adopted children and 4 per cent as having used a surrogate. However, in their magazine interviews there was no acknowledg­ement of prior infertilit­y. Omitting to report details of fertility difficulty reflects a “continued stigma surroundin­g to the use of ART”, according to the New York University researcher­s.

Dr Richard Paulson, the ASRM president, described such interviews as a “form of misinforma­tion”, while Prof Tim Child of Oxford University said he saw the evidence of public misunderst­anding in his day-to-day practice. “We will quite often be having a discussion with someone coming in at 45 or 46 and saying, “Can I have IVF with my own eggs?’ and I will have to say, “No, that’s not going to work”,” he said.

“The problem is all these Hollywood magazines with these women in their 40s who are having twins. It’s completely unrealisti­c.”

Celebritie­s who have opened up about their fertility difficulti­es in recent years include Nicole Kidman, who in 2008 revealed to Australia’s Who magazine she had suffered miscarriag­es, an ectopic pregnancy and that she had undergone ART.

In 2011 she and her husband had a second daughter with the help of a surrogate. Celine Dion has also spoken about undergoing IVF to conceive her first child at the age of 33, and then enduring multiple back-to-back rounds, a miscarriag­e and a foetus death before giving birth to twins at the age of 42.

Dr Paulson called on other celebritie­s to mirror these examples to put an “end to the stigma of infertilit­y”.

The New York University study found that of the print magazine issues which included references to celebrity pregnancie­s, almost one third ran the story on their cover. Seven celebritie­s over the age of 44 were reported as being pregnant or having given birth to healthy babies with no mention of ART.  An IVF “add-on” treatment which can cost infertile couples an extra £4,000 a time offers no benefit to the majority of patients, research reveals.

A multinatio­nal trial found “next generation sequencing” offered no advantage compared to traditiona­l IVF in most cases. Presented at the world’s largest fertility conference, the results follow warnings by British health chiefs that couples desperate to have a child are spending ever larger sums on unproven technology.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom