The Daily Telegraph

This glamorous retro drama beats any catwalk show

- Lisa Armstrong

Most people in decent societies would agree (above the line at least) that a woman should be able to wear whatever she likes without being jumped on. But, as we’re finally beginning to acknowledg­e publicly, what we wear has consequenc­es.

Clothes matter. They can offend in their sloppiness, their ostentatio­usness and their lack (or excess) of modesty. Alternativ­ely, they can seduce entire nations, as when a visiting Duchess wears a maple leaf hat in Canada, or a First Lady chooses British for a rendezvous in London.

We know this, which is why most of us are still prepared to modify our normal attire when we enter a religious building, or attend a “do”. It’s why Hollywood chose to make a universal show of wearing black to the Golden Globes. Sometimes, the hem is mightier than the sword.

One designer who intuitivel­y understand­s the power of clothes, in her own quiet way, is Phoebe Philo. That’s why her decision last December to leave Céline after 10 years was a blow, and the announceme­nt this week that she will be replaced by Hedi Slimane a shock.

These might sound like rich women’s problems. But while Céline’s clothes were eyewaterin­gly expensive, Philo’s stealth reinventio­n of elegance, her interestin­g proportion­s, her never predictabl­e silhouette­s, her faultless (but not boring) taste, her endless ability to reinvent classics such as pea coats, trench coats, blazers and slouchy trousers, always in discreetly luxurious fabrics, and her championin­g of comfort (she’s the woman you can thank for trainers now being a smart staple in your wardrobe, for totes being light and unfussy, for beautiful knits you’d be proud to wear to the office or to dinner, for a thousand and one asymmetric pleated skirts, for high-cut shoes, for metal heels) profoundly influenced many other design teams – everyone from ASOS to Zara.

Slimane’s four-year tenure at Saint Laurent was equally successful, commercial­ly. But his vision – Courtney Love meets every skinny wannabe Emo-boy you’ve ever met – was the Platonic opposite of Philo’s. She dressed women for the female gaze. He dressed them to go forth and live out their fantasy as rock chicks.

Quite what he’ll do at Céline, where he’s also been charged with introducin­g couture, menswear and a beauty line, was the talk of couture week. Where are the designers who can bring us a way to be feminine that takes stock of what’s going on out there in the wider world (as Philo unfailingl­y did)?

There wasn’t much evidence of any kind of new thinking in the couture shows themselves, which often seemed trapped in visions of women that looked outdated to a risible degree. Instead, there were structures as stiff as mountains, models as thin as wire hangers, not a woman over 30, not on the catwalks at least, and visions of femininity so sickly sweet they could elicit major eye-rolling from a five-year-old. If you judged femininity by what was here, it didn’t appear to have materially moved on from the Fifties.

And if you need a reminder of why the Fifites really weren’t that great for women, I recommend Amazon Prime’s The Marvelous Mrs Maisel. An engaging tale of an Upper West Side Jewish princess turned accidental stand-up comic.

It has its wobbly moments, chief among them, for me at least, the fact that Midge Maisel’s stage act is not actually very funny, unlike her offstage antics. But it’s sharply observed, the clothes are absolutely terrific, and once her weedy husband abandons her and she finds her feet in the world, Midge exhibits all the hallmarks of a feminist icon.

Unlike Mad Men’s hypnotic adoration for all things midcentury, this show has one eyebrow permanentl­y arched. Midge Maisel is a fashion plate with a penchant for French designers but, as her sidekick and manager, the butch, beat-nicky Susie Meyerson frequently points out, all her itty bits are pains in the neck, albeit pretty ones. Midge knows this. The lyrics of the opening soundtrack to one episode, featuring Midge flouncing her way down a Manhattan street, go like this:

“I adore being dressed in something frilly;

When my date comes to get me at my place;

Out I go with my Joe or John or Billy like a filly who is ready for the race; When I have a brand new hair do;

With my eyelashes all in curls, I float as the clouds on air do I enjoy being a girl…”

It’s charmingly cringy, because we know whose side the story’s on – and it’s not those bouncy, frothy, cumbersome outfits. Only when she’s caught in the rain on the way to one of her downtown comedy dives, damp hair and smudged make-up suddenly looking like something out of a Saint Laurent campaign, does Midge seem liberated.

And then there’s Feud, the BBC mini series depicting the decades long rivalry between Joan Crawford and Bette Davis, which culminated in a pitchfork battle when they were filming the cult classic What Ever Happened to Baby Jane (1962). The depiction of how they were written off for being too old and then, even after Baby Jane was an unexpected box office smash, typecast as hagaliciou­s freaks, is depressing­ly familiar. But the clothes…

I’m not talking about the little-girly horror Davis wears as Baby Jane. “Off-set”, the actresses (played by the reliably wonderful Jessica Lange and Susan Sarandon) wear a succession of elegant silk dresses and coats (Crawford) and Katherine Heburnesqu­e slacks and blouses and elegant, paredback shirt dresses (Davis) – dignified, graceful and practical attire in which to plot the ultimate revenge.

We badly need more of this knowingnes­s on the catwalks, because when TV offers a more thought-provoking take on clothes than designers, it’s time to hit refresh.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Icons: Rachel Brosnahan as Mrs Maisel and Susan Sarandon and Jessica Lange in Feud
Icons: Rachel Brosnahan as Mrs Maisel and Susan Sarandon and Jessica Lange in Feud
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom