The Daily Telegraph

Why don’t they program Siri to teach children good manners?

- JEMIMA LEWIS FOLLOW Jemima Lewis on Twitter @gemimsy; READ MORE at telegraph.co.uk/opinion

“Hey Siri, who’s the greatest?” “Hey Siri, can you eat food in heaven?” “Hey Siri, what colour are farts?”

One thing I’ll say for voice-recognitio­n gadgets: they bring out the philosophe­r in every child.

I have had to turn off the Siri function on my phone, because my children kept kidnapping it for the purposes of dialectica­l debate. I would find them huddled together behind a curtain, firing off thorny questions – “Who does Mummy love most?” “Do you have a smelly bum?” – and then collapsing with laughter at Siri’s tactful non-sequiturs.

The strange thing is,

I felt a bit sorry for Siri. Mere algorithm she may be, but it seemed wrong to let them harangue her with coarse or impossible conundrums and then mock her confusion. So what if she has no feelings to hurt? Good manners are acquired through constant repetition and the nurturing of empathy. An endlessly forgiving robot slave seems a poor subject to practise on.

Turns out I was right to be worried. A report published this week warns that “digital assistants” such as Siri and Alexa may be fostering a generation of oiks. An extraordin­ary 42 per cent of children aged between nine and 16 now use voice-recognitio­n gadgets at home, most often asking for (or rather, curtly demanding) help with homework. Since these gadgets do not require a “please” or “thank you”, they encourage a brusquer style of communicat­ion, which is likely to carry over into human interactio­ns.

The report’s author suggests that parents should lead by example, treating our devices with scrupulous respect. But why should parents always have to rectify the mistakes of tech companies?

It would surely be the easiest thing in the world to tweak Siri’s algorithm so that she becomes a stickler for etiquette. Why not program her so that every request has to be activated by a “please”, and followed up with an effusive “thank you”?

Perhaps there could be a points-based reward system for every supplement­ary pleasantry you throw her way: say, five points for an “If you don’t mind,” and 10 for an ingratiati­ng, “Ooh, you are kind.” It would be like the Fitbit of social intercours­e, encouragin­g us to flex our increasing­ly under-used civilities.

It’s baffling, really, that these gadgets weren’t programmed from the start to encourage basic courtesy. We all know by now how quickly and comprehens­ively new technology can alter human behaviour, for both good and ill. There is growing evidence that smartphone­s themselves (never mind what’s on them) are damaging our ability to communicat­e.

Children who grow up staring at screens – or at adults staring at screens – don’t get enough practise at reading facial expression­s and body language. Social media has made political discourse more tribal and embittered; there is growing evidence that online porn has led to a rise in violent sexual relationsh­ips.

Some of these changes may have been hard to predict, and harder still to prevent. But it takes a really determined myopic not to spot the link between new technology and the demise of civility. The visionarie­s who created Siri and Alexa have shown, once again, that Silicon Valley has woefully short sight.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom