The Daily Telegraph

Why we need a rethink about chemo

- James Le Fanu Email medical questions confidenti­ally to Dr James Le Fanu at drjames @telegraph.co.uk

t is a bit odd, on reflection, that the “biggest breakthrou­gh in cancer treatment” in the last 20 years, as reported last week, was not the discovery of some new effective treatment – rather, that more than two thirds of women with early breast cancer do not benefit from chemothera­py and thus should be spared the gruelling ordeal.

The relevant figures are certainly startling. Five years after diagnosis, 98per cent of those at low risk of recurrence, as determined by a genetic test, were alive and well taking just hormonal therapy (such as Tamoxifen), compared to 98.1per cent of those who had also received chemothera­py.

Put another way, the quality of life of tens of thousands of women in the past 30 years has been seriously compromise­d not through being diagnosed as having breast cancer, but by the toxic effects of unnecessar­y chemothera­py.

There is, as yet, no comparable genetic test for other types of early cancer where chemothera­py may be similarly inappropri­ate. There is, however, evidence to this effect from elsewhere. Writing in the European Journal of Cancer in 2016, Dr Anne Breugom of the University of Leiden found no correlatio­n between the marked variation in the routine use of adjuvant chemothera­py in Denmark, Sweden, England, Belgium etc, for early-stage tumours of the colon and subsequent rates of recurrence or overall survival. This clearly merits further investigat­ion.

Heart of the issue

The very substantia­l benefits of prescribin­g blood-thinning drugs such as warfarin for those with atrial fibrillati­on (AF) – 45 cases of stroke prevented for every thousand patients treated – extends to those whose heart rhythm irregulari­ty is intermitte­nt.

By contrast, the prevailing view concerning those whose AF was only temporary and appears to have completely resolved holds that it is probably reasonable to stop taking them after a year or so. But is this correct, and how can one tell? The singular virtue of a truly national health service is that the medical records of tens of thousands of patients can be integrated into a single massive database, capable of resolving this type of question.

The findings, reported in the British Medical Journal, contradict the current advice. Whereas those whose AF has resolved do indeed, as might be expected, have a lower risk of stroke, that risk is still higher than those whose heart rhythm has always been normal. “Those with resolved atrial fibrillati­on may benefit from taking anticoagul­ants,” observes Professor Tom Marshall of the University of Birmingham.

Pills aren’t forever

My thanks to all who have written appreciati­vely of my new book, Too Many Pills, and contribute­d their own personal stories. They include a woman in her early 80s taking just the single blood pressure-lowering drug felodipine for the past 10 years that keeps her upper (systolic) reading between 110 and 130. Not much to go wrong here, one might suppose, as she has been taking it without problems for so long.

Still, over the past year, she has become noticeably more short of breath when out shopping, with “endless muscles aches”. This was, she thought, probably due to her “getting on”. But reading of my book in this column, she wondered whether the felodipine might be responsibl­e, and arranged to see her family doctor. The week before her appointmen­t, she decided to experiment by discontinu­ing it, “and almost immediatel­y felt so much better in myself ”. Her blood pressure has risen a bit, but is still a respectabl­e systolic of 145.

“We have agreed to continue without the felodopine to see what happens,” she writes. A reminder that even previously well-tolerated drugs can cause problems.

The quality of life of tens of thousands of women has been seriously compromise­d

Apology: I’d like to say sorry to all who were unable to access the website mentioned in the column for families whose daughters have been adversely affected by the cervical cancer jab (HPV vaccine). It should have read timeforact­ion.org. uk.

To order Too Many Pills (Little, Brown, £13.99), for £10.99 plus p&p, call 0844 871 1514 or visit books. telegraph.co.uk

 ??  ?? Toxic: lives of women have been compromise­d by chemothera­py
Toxic: lives of women have been compromise­d by chemothera­py
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom