The Daily Telegraph

Peers back Brexit rebels

- By Steven Swinford Deputy political editor

THERESA MAY is facing a showdown with pro-european Tory MPS after the Lords overwhelmi­ngly backed plans to give Parliament a “meaningful vote” if no deal is reached with the EU.

The Government was defeated by 119 votes after a Conservati­ve peer tabled an amendment that ministers believe will undermine Brexit by tying the Prime Minister’s hands in negotiatio­ns.

The defeat sets up a clash between the Government and pro-european MPS led by Dominic Grieve, the former attorney general, when the EU (Withdrawal) Bill returns to the Commons tomorrow.

About 14 Tory MPS are prepared to rebel against the Government, which is refusing to accept the Lords amendment because it believes it would effectivel­y enable Parliament to direct talks.

Last week, Mrs May headed off a rebellion by making “personal assurances” to a dozen rebels that she would address their concerns over Parliament being given a meaningful vote. But

when the final amendment was tabled it made clear that the Commons would only be able to pass a motion saying that it had “considered” the matter, which critics said rendered the meaningful vote “meaningles­s”.

In the Lords yesterday, Viscount Hailsham – the former Conservati­ve Cabinet minister Douglas Hogg – tabled an updated version of the amendment by Mr Grieve that was rejected by the Government.

Lord Hailsham was embroiled in the MPS’ expenses scandal after he charged the taxpayer to clean his moat. David Cameron elevated him to the Lords in his dissolutio­n honours list despite having to withdraw a previous nomination.

During angry exchanges in the Lords, which were watched by Mr Grieve, Lord Hailsham claimed Brexit was a “national calamity”.

He told peers: “This Government has sought to prevent a meaningful vote in every possible way. I want to ensure that Parliament does have a meaningful vote and I don’t want to see that left to chance.” Lord Robathan, a pro-brexit Tory peer, accused his colleague of wishing to “destroy Brexit” and said his interventi­on was all about “sabotaging” the UK’S departure from the EU. One peer was overheard calling him an “idiot” as he made the comment.

Lord Howard, the former Conservati­ve leader, said that the amendment would “confer upon Parliament a negotiatio­n power which has always resided in the hands of the executive in our country”. Despite the warnings, 22 Tory peers backed Lord Hailsham’s amendment. The Prime Minister said that she had been listening to the concerns of critics but the legislatio­n must not restrict her freedom in talks with Brussels.

“As we keep faith with people who voted to leave the European Union, and many of those who didn’t but are now saying ‘let’s just get on with it’, we need to make sure we are putting this legislatio­n into place,” she said. As we do that, of course we have been listening to concerns about the role of Parliament, but we need to make sure that Parliament can’t tie the Government’s hands in negotiatio­n and can’t overturn the will of the British people.”

Mr Grieve insisted rebels would only accept a “meaningful vote” and not the “slavery clause” offered by the Government. Nigel Evans, the pro-brexit MP, said he was “staggered” by Mr Grieve’s remarks. He told BBC Radio 4’s Westminste­r Hour: “I don’t want to fetter my Prime Minister while she’s negotiatin­g the best deal for Britain.”

Last night Jacob Rees-mogg, the leading Tory Brexiteer, said that the meaningful vote was being used to “obstruct Brexit” and “thwart the referendum result”.

 ??  ?? Dominic Grieve watches the debate in the House of Lords yesterday
Dominic Grieve watches the debate in the House of Lords yesterday

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom