The Daily Telegraph

The wonder of the space race is brought back down to Earth

- By Robbie Collin First Man will be released in the UK on Oct 12

Sunk in political bedlam at home and abroad, and repeatedly humiliated by Russia on the world stage, will the United States ever lead the world again? That is one of the questions posed by First Man, the new film from Damien Chazelle, which presents the last leg of the space race as seen through the eyes of Ryan Gosling’s Neil Armstrong, the aeronautic­al engineer-turned-nasa astronaut who would go on to win it, by one small, fateful step.

Admirers of the 33-year-old director’s two recent crowd-pleasers, Whiplash and La La Land, might be reasonably expecting a snappy, personalit­y-driven biopic with lots of men in short-sleeved shirts waving fistfuls of paper in the air. But First Man, which was adapted by Josh Singer (Spotlight, The Post) from an Armstrong biography by James R Hansen, is a very different propositio­n: less a slinky, millennial take on The Right Stuff than John Cassavetes goes to outer space, with lived-in performanc­es, hand-held camerawork with period-perfect film grain and a colour palette full of the ochres and umbers of mid-century, middle class American domestic life.

It centres on a thoughtful, tampeddown star-turn from Gosling, whose Armstrong is both a reluctant hero and a man mired in grief, following the loss of his two-year-old daughter Karen to an inoperable brain tumour in 1962. The early sight of the young girl lying on a hospital bed beneath a huge radiothera­py rig is the closest the film ever comes to science fiction, and it is an image that resonates until the film’s skin-pricklingl­y staged lunar climax.

Wisely, Chazelle has opted to leave spectacle to the blockbuste­rs and instead aims for awe – which is related, but different, and harder to pull off. The former shows you something you haven’t seen before. The latter involves showing you something you see every day from a perspectiv­e that makes it newly strange.

First Man chases awe from its 1961-set opening sequence, in which Armstrong flies an experiment­al X-15 aircraft high enough for the ship to “bounce off the atmosphere” on its descent. Linus Sandgren’s camera remains in the cockpit throughout, squirrelli­ng into any nook it can find. Armstrong’s panic become our panic, as the hull lets out unholy groans and the altimeter spins and pops. Then as his flight-path crests, the planet’s rainbow rim reflects in his visor, and his amazement becomes ours too.

There is significan­tly less amazement back on Earth, and a lot more hard work. It would be too simple to say First Man only takes off when it – ahem – takes off: the ground-level drama is what gives the extraterre­strial parts their emotional stakes. But there is something very methodical about the film’s route through Armstrong’s personal history: a little domestic drama involving Armstrong’s first wife Janet (Claire Foy), then some crisis at Nasa, or the Soviets make another headlinegr­abbing advance, then repeat.

The supporting performanc­es are strong: Foy is rather doomed to playing a stay-at-home housewife because that is who Janet was, but the part has a bit more texture than the usual fretting-over-the-sink stereotype. Kyle Chandler and Ciarán Hinds are brusque Nasa functionar­ies, Jason Clarke well-cast as another astronaut, Ed White, and Corey Stoll has fun as Buzz Aldrin, whom the film paints as a pain in the neck, but a natural at handling the press. Armstrong himself is a congenital introvert, which is perhaps why the film leans into his personal tragedy as much as it does: it allows us to feel something for a character who lets little else slip.

It also gives an emotional undertow to the moon landing finale itself – which, it is implied, gives Armstrong the literally unearthly perspectiv­e required to process his heartbreak­ing loss. The less said in advance about this staggering sequence the better, other than that it crackles with eeriness and wonder, looks utterly real, and is the reason to see First Man on the biggest cinema screen you can find. Chazelle has always specialise­d in virtuoso endings, and his sure hand and sharp eye brings this ambitious character study smoothly into land.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom