The Daily Telegraph

Juliet Stevenson shines in a superb farewell from a great British director

- By Fiona Mountford

The Doctor Almeida, London N1 ★★★★★

It’s a fond farewell to Robert Icke. The brightest directing talent British theatre has produced in a generation – and the youngest ever winner of the Olivier Award for Best Director to boot – is leaving his permanent post on these shores for pastures new, and possibly more experiment­al, in Europe. His final huzzah at the Almeida, the venue that has nurtured Icke and given rise to his phenomenal work on Oresteia and

Mary Stuart, to name but two, serves as a razor-sharp reminder of what is about to be lost.

For starters, Icke must once more be ruing the fact that theatre doesn’t follow film’s lead and include a Best Adapted Play category in its award ceremonies as, in addition to his directoria­l nous he is equally adept at intellectu­ally dazzling new spins on classic texts. He freely, skilfully and rigorously transposes Arthur Schnitzler’s 1912 Viennese drama

Professor Bernhardi to contempora­ry England, gently nudging the debate along from its starting point of medical ethics to cover personal morality and, finally, the hot topic of identity politics. The impassione­d howl he raises against the reductive nature of the latter could surely be heard on the continent.

Schnitzler’s original afforded almost no airtime to women, a fact that Icke corrects at a stroke by turning the male professor into Dr Ruth Woolf (Juliet Stevenson). She is the founding director of the prestigiou­s Elizabeth Institute, a stern profession­al with an attitude of “trademark disdain”. The catalyst for the drama is when a 14-year-old, dying of sepsis after a botched at-home abortion, comes into the care of Dr Wolff, who refuses

admittance to a priest (Paul Higgins) when he wishes to administer the last rites. Dr Wolff asserts firmly that her patient’s religious conviction­s are uncertain and the girl must be left to die in peace.

Arguments and recriminat­ions about religion – Dr Wolff ’s parents were Jewish – are the first to bubble up, followed swiftly by race, gender and education, as various interested parties engage in a ferocious battle, stoked by social media, to stake out the greatest claim of victimhood. In a script note, Icke states that “each actor’s identity should be directly dissonant with their character’s in at least one way”, and he embarks upon a thrilling series of games of theatrical­ity and rug-pulling in which nothing is quite what – or who – it seems. Actresses, for example, suddenly assert their character’s masculinit­y, whereas a white actor announces “I’m a black man”.

We are, the play says from its slickly impersonal set on a slow revolve, far more complex than a series of simplistic labels. This assertion is underscore­d by Dr Wolff ’s home life, which comprises two shadowy figures whose truths are revealed only late on.

Stevenson has shone for Icke in two of his previous Almeida production­s

(Hamlet and Mary Stuart) and does so again here, in a towering performanc­e that will surely win awards. Stevenson walks the finest of tightropes, brilliantl­y ensuring that while we sympathise with Dr Wolff ’s impossible predicamen­t, we never warm to her.

Her uncompromi­sing mien starts to crumble and she becomes a rumpled, hounded figure whose certaintie­s are brutally chipped away by detractors on all sides whose personal agendas hold no regard for medical best practice. There’s strong support too from that intriguing­ly shape-shifting actress Ria Zmitrowicz as a gauche, truth-telling teenager.

Icke’s work is less flashy and more incisive than some of his previous offerings and the result is a piece of theatre of the highest calibre. It is greatly to be hoped that he does not stay away too long.

 ??  ?? Towering performanc­e: Juliet Stevenson as Dr Woolf, left, with Joy Richardson as Charlie
Towering performanc­e: Juliet Stevenson as Dr Woolf, left, with Joy Richardson as Charlie

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom