The Daily Telegraph

Claims of a ‘race to the bottom’ on standards verge on the paranoid

- By Madeline Grant

Britain may have left the European Union, but the spectre of Project Fear is still haunting the national debate. Many equate the Prime Minister’s imminent calls for a clean break from EU regulatory bodies with a “race to the bottom” on standards. Away from the EU’S benevolent orbit, they assume, the UK will inevitably repeal consumer and environmen­tal protection­s, workers’ rights and equalities legislatio­n. Yet a glance at Britain’s historic approach – and the Government’s own priorities – suggests that such claims verge on the paranoid.

The last general election yielded a number of absurd memes, not least the depiction of Boris Johnson as a deregulati­ng neo-thatcherit­e, committed to privatisin­g the NHS by stealth. In fact, almost every policy decision since then suggests the inverse. The Tories are shifting Leftward economical­ly while moving to the Right culturally. They plan to pump money into large-scale infrastruc­ture projects and the NHS, and address regional inequaliti­es through top-down interventi­on.

Already, the PM has pledged to use Brexit’s opportunit­ies to bypass EU state aid rules.

The Chancellor recently raised the national minimum wage to £10.50 an hour. So, given the direction of travel, a “race to the bottom” seems unlikely.

Critics ignore many areas where UK protection­s exceed European norms. Britain’s 39 weeks of paid statutory maternity leave, for example, are considerab­ly more generous than the 14 guaranteed under EU law, and well above OECD averages. The TUC recently warned that Brexit could jeopardise vacation entitlemen­ts, even though UK holiday legislatio­n predates our EU accession by 35 years, and recent Government decisions have taken holiday leave up to 28 days minimum, compared to the EU requiremen­t of 20.

Such fear-mongering becomes especially absurd when applied to environmen­tal issues, where the UK has arguably made more wide-ranging and costly commitment­s than any other European country.

As ever, Britain’s critics seem unaware of continenta­l norms – take coal-guzzling Germany. Rightly or wrongly, this government is ploughing ahead with Theresa May’s hastilydra­wn commitment to full decarbonis­ation by 2050. It has already capitulate­d to precaution­ary EU thinking by outlawing so-called “chlorinate­d chicken” and other US exports after Brexit. The PM is reportedly expediting bans on new petrol and diesel cars. Mainstream politics has remained immune from the far-right, unlike some EU member states. By suggesting that post-brexit Britain will become a retrograde backwater, commentato­rs do a disservice to the moderate electorate.

“Proud Europeans” who insist our rights were won in Brussels are guilty of the same blinkered, misty-eyed patriotism that they attribute to Brexiteers – only directed at continenta­l Europe this time.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom